50 Things to Save the Planet

Just a couple of them:

Tony Juniper says we should scrap environmentally destructive “free” trade agreements in favour of ‘a new sustainable trade agreement’.

Given that the case for free trade, when you take the nation state out of it, simply collapses to the case for market exchange, d\’ye think our Tony is hankering after something a little less than sensible?

Population growth – it’s environmentalists’ elephant in the room. But we ignore it at our peril, says Nick Reeves. ‘Global population is now six billion and is projected to be 11 billion by 2050. Scratch the surface of any environmental problem and it reveals population growth, and the way we live our lives, as the root cause. The need for a population policy has never been more urgent. While governments continue to see big populations as an indicator of economic strength, with a place at the top table of the UN guaranteed, the population problem will escalate and lead to environmental catastrophe.’

Err, that 11 billion and rising comes from projections of a world where we reduce trade, reduce globalisation. The peak at 9 billion then falling comes from a world in which we increase trade, increase wealth, increase globalisation. Nick and Tony appear to be arguing at cross purposes here, don\’t they?

And how about this for a novel idea from David Boyle – local, city and regional currencies. ‘They mean we use resources more efficiently,’ he says – something people have already started doing in Totnes.

Beg pardon? How does that work? If the currencies are exchangable, then it makes no difference (only the minor incovenience of the exchange itself) and if they\’re not exchangable then we\’ve just insisted that each locality is self-supporting: see above about trade and population.

Not, I think, the most convincing of proposals.

3 comments on “50 Things to Save the Planet

  1. #44 is interesting, it is proposing using incineration with CHP for energy generation, albeit on existing plants only.

    Could it be the case that incineration, and even landfill, both of which generate energy from waste, can actually do “energy reclamation” more efficiently than recycling, which has too many overheads in transport costs, etc.

  2. He’s probably talking about a LETS scheme. They remind me of a scene from the hippy jam fest episode of South Park:-

    MAN 2: Right now we’re proving we don’t need corporations. We don’t need money. This can become a commune where everyone just helps each other.

    MAN 1: Yeah, we’ll have one guy who like, who like, makes bread. A-and one guy who like, l-looks out for other people’s safety.

    STAN: You mean like a baker and a cop?

    MAN 2: No no, can’t you imagine a place where people live together and like, provide services for each other in exchange for their services?

    KYLE: Yeah, it’s called a town.

  3. Johnny’s back!

    “First thing we do, let’s kill all the greenies” Henry VI part II

    there is no point arguing with them, and science truth and the enlightenment are too sweet and valuable to let the greenies shit all over them.

    To Arms! Sons and Daughters of Reason.

Leave a Reply

Name and email are required. Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.