George Today

But, after reading the proofs of a book by the independent thinker Oliver Tickell, to be published next month, I have changed my view. In Kyoto2: How to Manage the Global Greenhouse, Tickell slaughters my favourite ideas. He shows that there is no logical basis for dividing up the right to pollute among nation states. It gives them too much power over this commodity, and there is no guarantee that they would pass the pollution rights on to their citizens, or use the money they raised to green the economy. Carbon rationing, he argues, requires a level of economic literacy that\’s far from universal in the most advanced economies, let alone in countries where most people don\’t have bank accounts.

Instead Tickell proposes setting a global limit for carbon pollution then selling permits to pollute to companies extracting or refining fossil fuels.

Global cap and trade? This is hardly a new idea now, is it?

 

3 comments on “George Today

  1. Why do they ignore a rather simpler idea of a carbon tax? Scrap income tax and I would be all in favour.

  2. Instead Tickell proposes setting a global limit for carbon pollution then selling permits to pollute to companies extracting or refining fossil fuels.

    Yeah, I can really see the likes of Gazprom forking out a few billion dollars simply in order to continue doing what they have always done. The faith these people place in governments is mind-boggling.

  3. When you have the hammer of global governance, every problem looks like a nail, doesn’t it?

Leave a Reply

Name and email are required. Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.