5 comments on “Daily Mail questions to which the answer is \”No\”

  1. That’s a reactor (I think) not an explosion. Unless there were some natural process for enriching uranium, you couldn’t get an explosion unless you go back so far in time that the Uranium was naturally rich enough in U235, I’d think.

  2. Which reminds me, Tim: you sent me a personal reply to a comment of mine on global warming, for which I forgot to thank you because of work pressures at the time.

    Best wishes.

Leave a Reply

Name and email are required. Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>