4 comments on “Why the Spirit Level is wrong

  1. diogenes1960:

    No real use–they’ll just find another line on which to hang similar dirtywash.

    And, no matter what objections to whatever data are raised (and thoroughly supported), they’ll just bleat “but how ’bout all these other studies by all these other respectable scientists that found something somewhat similar to what you’ve critcized about what this one’s said?”

    The subjects vary widely; the methods never do.

  2. Pingback: FCAblog » Green-eyed monster

Leave a Reply

Name and email are required. Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.