As there was in Granny Roseleen so there is in Jenny McCartney:
Here’s how I like my law: sharp, clear and tightly worded, so that everyone – even those with soup for brains and the morals of an alley cat – knows when it is being broken. For an example of how not to do law, however, we must look to the Council of Europe’s convention on violence against women,
Quite. If there is to be a law we must, all of us, be able to understand it.
Mentioning Ulster has brought to mind a religious analogy. The Catholic Church operated for centuries on the idea that the proles shouldn\’t worry themselves over much. Allow the, quite literally, priestly caste to worry about the details and those proles should just do what they are told by those in the know \”interpreting\” matters.
The Protestant revolution was, in part (it never does to strain these analogy/simile things too much) that the Bible, when in the vernacular, as clear an outline of God\’s will as any should need. Intervention was not needed, a man could commune directly with the Word and the Will of God.
On the matter of the law I am a Protestant. As rigid and unyielding as any Puritan, Lutheran or Calvinist. With a twist of course: the law must be written so that it can be understood directly, without that intervention of the priestly caste of lawyers, accountants, diversity advisors or bureaucrat\’s helplines.
If you cannot write a law with the clarity of \”thou shalt not kill\” then go away and think through what it is that you\’re trying to enact, the language that you are using to do so until you can, with clarity, tell us what it is that we must not do at fear of time in pokey.
That modern society is complex is no excuse. If you cannot write simple and simply understood laws then better that we have fewer laws.
That the Puritans went gargantuanly off the rails by using their new found revelations of God\’s Will to tell everyone else what to do is true. But I do find it interesting that our new would be ruling class, the nomenklatura, are adopting such a Catholic view of the law. We\’ll make it all so complex that no individual can understand it and thus there is the necessity of that nomenklatura to tell people what to do in detail by \”interpreting\” it.