Timmy elsewhere

At the ASI:

Which is something that has always puzzled me. Why is it so difficult to persuade those who have had and enjoyed a toot that it would be a good idea to make it easier, safer, less violent and less destructive of civil liberties for everyone else to enjoy a toot? Sure, you or I may think that making it to the front bench is as low as any human being could go, as far as it is possible to fall as a result of the evils that drug use will do to you, killing brain cells and suppressing all morals, but surely the politicians themselves don\’t think that, do they?

 

One comment on “Timmy elsewhere

  1. ‘we strengthen public health and social protection systems in order to prevent substance abuse and provide support to drug addicts and their relatives?’

    Why should we? Its their choice.

    A tsunami of ‘addiction treatment’ and sickness benefits – the start of a great industry!

    Proponents will claim that the costs will be paid out of increased tax revenue – which of course won’t find its way into politicians pet projects (ie reelection)… or will it?

    Build a sense of responsibility into any changes and not a cult of victimhood and more people might be open to the idea

Leave a Reply

Name and email are required. Your email address will not be published.