You can’t blackmail a known adulterer with tales of adultery

The most convincing proof to me that the Russians weren’t involved is that said Russians are not idiots:

Within seconds Trump was throwing punches, suggesting it would be a “tremendous blot” on the record of the intelligence agencies if they were responsible for leaking the now notorious kompromat dossier, which alleges that Russian intelligence has evidence of perverted sexual behaviour by Trump.

It’s been generally known for decades that Trump screws whatever he can. He’s been known to seat his wife (of the time) and current mistress at the same table at parties just for the joy of it. Kompromat of his having odd sexual tastes is not in fact kompromat therefore.

It doesn’t really matter what the odd sexual tastes are either. Golden showers or that he gave Michelle a blow job, doesn’t really matter. It’s just not compromising in the way that, say, an evangelist getting it on with a hooker is.

And people who do blackmail know this. Evidence that James Bond shags stunners does not provide a hold over James Bond now, does it?

27 comments on “You can’t blackmail a known adulterer with tales of adultery

  1. Yes, when the claims were about “embarrassing evidence”, I thought that the lesson of the campaign was that The Donald doesn’t embarrass easily.

    Which is really rather lucky if you think about it because if I behaved like he does, I’d be beet red most of the time. But then I haven’t had 30+ years of people letting me get away with outrageous behaviour because I’m a billionaire to prepare me.

  2. It is hard to think of a sexual act Trump could have done that would actually work at this point. What haven’t his supporters already considered and discounted? The standard cliche is a dead girl or a live boy. Perhaps a dead girl might work.

    Although I would love to see evidence of a live boy. It would be so hard for the Left to condemn him as that would be homophobic.

  3. A rich man playing Wives vs Mistresses is hardly “outrageous” behaviour in the cesspit that is the early 21st century.

    Most of the leftist scum trying to attack will likely be far bigger pervs than Trump.

  4. * It would be so hard for the Left to condemn him as that would be homophobic.”

    They’d do it anyway. They are shameless and live in the moment so have no need for consistency.

  5. I described Trump as an “oaf” on an American comment thread. One idiot replied that he couldn’t be an oaf because he was (i) a billionaire, and (ii) President elect.

  6. The piss story was interesting for what it revealed about the folks who were eager to believe it.

    Because it wasn’t so much the unconventional toilet habits that exorcised them, it was the idea Trump would somehow want to “desecrate” Obama’s wanking chariot. Y’know, like you do.

    Who throws a shoe? Honestly! – Austin Powers

    INT. POSH MOSCOW HOTEL

    TRUMP: And you say this is the room Obama slept in?

    RUSSIAN KGB HOOKERS: Da, Agent Trump! You can still see Michelle’s stubble in the sink.

    TRUMP: Good. Here’s $20. Piss on the bed.

    RUSSIAN KGB HOOKERS: Uh, what?

    TRUMP: You heard me. I hate Obama, which is why I invented fake stories that he is a Kenyan and a secret Muslim. Also I am an insecure racist with small hands. But enough monologuing. Piss on the bed. Bigly.

    RUSSIAN KGB HOOKERS: FOR MOTHER RUSSIA!

  7. “Oaf – a man who is rough or clumsy and unintelligent.”

    Difficult to see how a man could simultaneously be a billionaire, president elect of the most powerful democracy on the planet & of low IQ. And rough we like. But clumsy? Trump seems remarkably light on his feet in all senses.

    Does one detect the teeniest bit of British middle-class prejudice, dearieme? Surprised you didn’t manage to insert “little man” into the description.

  8. “They’d do it anyway. They are shameless and live in the moment so have no need for consistency.”

    They’re about due to throw the gays under the bus in any case. I know several people of that persuasion who have noticed which way the wind is blowing and switched their support to conservative or libertarian movements.

  9. Nah, I called him an oaf because that’s how he chooses to behave. If you don’t think an oaf could be Prez, how do you explain LBJ, a much rougher chap that Trump?

    If you don’t think a rough man could be a billionaire, I wonder at your gullibility.

  10. LBJ and urolagnia : didn’t he once call VP Hubert Humphrey into the john specifically to force him to watch the Pres pee?

  11. Dearieme. I’ve known quite a few rough millionaires. None of them were stupid. And once you get past the first few millions, the money’s only a way of keeping score, isn’t it?

  12. >TRUMP: Good. Here’s $20. Piss on the bed.

    In other words, piss on MY bed, the bed I need to sleep in tonight. Just so I get one over on Obama, even though Obama wouldn’t know.

  13. There was a time when watching a Jewish guy in a cowboy hat pissing on hookers dresses as young girls was considered a bit odd, these days though golden showers are heading for the vanilla end of the porn spectrum.

  14. It is hard to think of a sexual act Trump could have done that would actually work at this point.

    You’re imagination is lacking. Orgies with underage illegal immigrant girls? Berlusconi, who is the closes analogue to Trump, found that hard to bear, and his infidelities were well known already.

    I find accusations of Trump’s sexual behaviour odd because guys like him don’t need secret fantasies. He’s living his fantasy, and screwing women is a means of keeping score.

  15. Sorry, “your” imagination. I can spell.

    Another person of known depravity who found that there are lines you shouldn’t cross was Max Mosley. Some things are still shocking.

  16. @BiS: “None of them were stupid. ” I think you need to re-read the definition you trotted out, with particular attention to the ‘or’.

  17. >Another person of known depravity who found that there are lines you shouldn’t cross was Max Mosley. Some things are still shocking.

    Mosley seems remarkably unharmed by his expose. And the government is now about to hand over control of the press to him. I’d quite happily be filmed in a Nazi-themed orgy if that was the outcome.

  18. Chester Draws – “You’re imagination is lacking. Orgies with underage illegal immigrant girls? Berlusconi, who is the closes analogue to Trump, found that hard to bear, and his infidelities were well known already.”

    But it was not public outrage that got Berlusconi. The Left grossly manipulated the legal process until they could get a technicality they could hang him on. The public, I would guess, was somewhat relaxed about Miss Ruby.

    Chester Draws – “Some things are still shocking.”

    There is a whole world of Nazi-themed porn and has been for a long time. Even in Israel. I am not sure it is all that shocking that the son of a Nazi should have had a Nazi themed fantasy. It is more shocking that a film like The Night Porter could be entirely mainstream and someone like Charlotte Rampling suffer no consequences for starring in it.

    For that matter, what was Joy Division thinking? See also David Bowie.

  19. I stand corrected. Thanks to David Thompson I am will to retract my earlier statement. There is something Trump could do that would cause him severe social damage with his voters.

    He could adopt any of the tips from this Everyday Feminist article on having sex with the fat:

    http://everydayfeminism.com/2017/01/how-to-have-fat-sex/

    They promise another article soon on sex toys just for the morbidly obese. Oh still my beating heart!

  20. Though the Everyday Femiloons are jolly fat people, they are not jolly, fat people. They are the most un-jolly fat people I think I have ever seen. Somebody pointed out (might even have been me) that the so-called fat acceptance movement, in trying to shame normal people for not wanting to mount them and thrust futilely at a random fold after an evening of intersectionalist dialectic, are no different from those sad neckbeards who think girls that put “nice guys” like them in the Friendzone are bitches.

    The roly-polies’ attempts to blame Conservation of Energy on the Patriarchy are amusing, though.

  21. @SMFS

    Out of shameful curiosity I ventured on to your link – but couldn’t penetrate it (hah!) for the intervening pop-ups advertising “Healing from Toxic Whiteness – an online training program for racial justice from everydayfeminism.com”. Featuring a bunch of very white people holding up signs saying “White silence = Violence”.

    It’s psephologically interesting – in fact downright bizarre – that such an agenda of self-loathing can win the popular vote in the presidential election.

  22. Whoa there, hoss! Some of us prefer chubby chicks. Hammer the lefties, by all means, but don’t fall into the same trap that they did.

  23. Wasn’t it Assange/Wikileaks who said it would be difficult to publish anything more damaging than what already comes out of Trump’s mouth?

Leave a Reply

Name and email are required. Your email address will not be published.