Jessica Valenti’s latest demand

We’re told romance wouldn’t survive if men couldn’t pursue women who said “no” the first time,

She doesn’t even bother to think, does she?

So, if the only women you’re ever going to have sex with are those who say yes at the first time of asking that’s going to make dating damn cheap, isn’t it?

The scene. A bar. Man and woman, have just met, standing at bar.

Male: “Fancy a shag?”

Female: “No.”

Male: “Well, that’s saved my buying you an evening, or three, of booze, hasn’t it?”

Alternative reading of the scene:

The scene. A bar. Man and woman, have just met, standing at bar.

Male: “Fancy a shag?”

Female: “Yes.”

Male: “Well, that’s saved my buying you an evening, or three, of booze, hasn’t it?”

17 comments on “Jessica Valenti’s latest demand

  1. In a horrifying but brilliant piece for The Week, Lili Loofbourow writes about how often women are in pain during sex – a fact often ignored by culture and science, so long as men are still having “good” sex.

    It is nice to see a feminist lie take form. If anyone thinks that 30% of women are in pain, and only putting up with it for the sake of the children, well, they aren’t having much sex. And indeed this figure seems to be garbage. From the ultimate citation:

    About 30% of women and 7% of men reported pain during vaginal intercourse events, and most of the reports of pain were mild and of short duration.

    Mild. Short duration. That does not surprise.

  2. The people who are outraged – or even just concerned – about the direction of this movement should ask themselves whether they’re comfortable with sexual norms that say anything short of rape is OK. Or if they want a world where women’s pain and fear is treated as an expected part of romantic and sexual interactions.

    Well, yes pretty much. I would have said no a few years ago but there is this odd radicalisation thing going on. Can’t think what might be causing it. Anyway, there is legal and there is illegal. If someone is within the law, they are within the law and I have no intention of criticising them in an effort to White Knight for some lesbians.

    As for women’s pain and fear, if they did not like it, we would not take them to horror films in the reasonable expectation said fear means sex later on. Weird that innit?

  3. “Male: “Well, that’s saved my buying you an evening, or three, of booze, hasn’t it?””

    They’re now objecting to the man even asking. I think we’re just supposed to keep buying them dinner anyway.

  4. What would happen if there were some miracle pill that men could take that would completely end absolutely any interest in and drive towards sex. Just take the pill, everything else is the same but your only interest in your dick is peeing through it. Such a world might put human survival into the hazard but what would it do to women? Once the vaginal dick-lock that they presently have over us was gone what would happen to the wealth/status etc of women?

    I personally believe that without their “edge” so to speak they would rapidly drop lower than whaleshit. If “so what” and “Sort it out yourself love” became the style of male interaction with women then I don’t think that the female of the species would prosper.

    Valenti and the rest of the marxfem scum know that pussy-power abides and that they can–for the moment–get away with their bad attitudes and nasty little games and pronouncements.

    But who knows–somewhere a genius biochemist may be just starting his life’s work.

  5. Mr Ecks said:
    “Valenti and the rest of the marxfem scum know that pussy-power abides and that they can – for the moment – get away with their bad attitudes and nasty little games and pronouncements.”

    Perhaps they realise that won’t last forever, which explains why they’re trying to use government power instead of their own.

  6. Tim, no! That’s patriarchial sexist power-based rape! The man must wait for the female gatekeeper to initiate any sexual activity.

  7. Robot sex dolls. You know it is the future.

    Saw a programme on this and one US maker has them all speaking in Scottish accents

  8. “we demand more”

    Yes, men are a magic money tree. Oh no, they aren’t. You want more? Lose some weight, put on a thong and start gyrating to Sexy Back for fivers.

  9. Mr Ecks – Is this what they are seeing in Japan where the guys are more interested in porn than women… Herbivore men. They get the fix they need from a bit of alone time and can’t be bothered with the hassle of the rest of it?? could be completely wrong on that mind…

  10. Richard Feynman’s autobiography documents an experiment of asking a pretty lady: Before we waste time on each other, is it conceivable you would decide to come home with me tonight? The ladies who were intrigued by such bluntness were exactly the type the Professor was seeking (not just because they were easy), and there was a minimum of time and money wasted.

    That was one of two valuable lessons in the Las Vegas chapter; the other being, do not fight The House, but engage a spectator in a side bet, which is more honest gambling.

  11. Ecks
    I have also been pondering that question, although in the context of stoping guys serving abroad shagging the natives. The consequences of men being able to switch their sex drives on and off are intriguing. Probably not possible because “life will find a way” but there’s an sf story in it at least.

    Incidentally, wasn’t bromide supposed to suppress sex drive?

  12. ‘We demand more’

    More what? From whom?

    She’s barking at the moon.

    ‘Right now, women are asking for more than the bare minimum they’ve been taught to expect.’

    More what? Taught by whom?

    ‘They’re asking for a standard of behavior that sees them as full human beings rather than sexual objects.’

    False dichotomy. Being a ‘full human being,’ whateverthefuck that means, and a ‘sexual object,’ aren’t exclusive. Being a sexual object is basic biology, not subject to the dictates of feminazis.

    ‘They’re demanding that their desires and safety are universally accepted in the way that men’s are.’

    How can desires be accepted? How can safety be accepted? Universally? Men’s are? Wut?

    Word salad, devoid of meaning.

    Another feminazi declaration of dependence on men.

Leave a Reply

Name and email are required. Your email address will not be published.