The problem that Britain has, partly as a result of cultural and governmental promotion of ownership, is that renting is, objectively speaking, second best. You can currently pay more in rent than an owner would in mortgage interest
The owner has to finance and then also maintain, doesn’t she?
The assault by shadow chancellor John McDonnell came as he pledged total, “permanent” and cost-free renationalisation of water, energy and rail if Labour won power at the next election.
The logic goes like this. Government can borrow more cheaply than the private sector (well, most often, not always).
Buy the companies with the cheap money, the dividend income more than covers the interest costs, free money!
Well, OK. But did it actually work out that way last time around? Actually, no, it didn’t. The nationalised industries were less efficient. Less profit that is, for any given level of charges and or quality of service. We can tell this because both profits and levels of service have risen since privatisation.
At which point the question becomes well, what’s the balance between that lesser efficiency and the cheapness of financing? Past experience of nationalised British companies doesn’t favour the financing side of that equation, does it?
A burger van owner is considering hanging up his apron after making a £9million while trading stocks and shares online.
Stephen Bliss, 34, manages his trading fund at night from his home in Redcar using the social platform eToro.
Firstly, the entire piece reads as an ad for that trading platform. Secondly, and candidly, he’s not made that amount at all.
Currently, almost 7,000 people have invested in Mr Bliss’s fund which has a value of $12.75 million – £9 million.
He’s managing £9 million for mug punters.
Hmm. That’s fun actually. So, this platform, what’s the manager’s take on such a fund? One answer would be not much, given that he’s working in a burger van. Another could be ….well, anyone want to go find out? 2 and 20 would be fun, no?
My guess would be that you cannot charge a fee because FCA or summat.
The Governor of the Bank of England has urged the Government to abandon the use of the retail prices index (RPI) as a measure of inflation, especially in the issuance of government bonds.
The intervention by Mark Carney could have profound implications for both savers and borrowers because RPI tends to run at 0.7 percentage points higher than the consumer prices index (CPI), which is increasingly considered to be a more reliable measure of inflation. Nevertheless, RPI is still widely used in government contracts.
“It would be helpful to have just one public-facing measure of cost of living for consumers,” Mr Carney told the House of Lords’ economic affairs committee. “At the moment we have the RPI, which most people acknowledge is of no merit, and CPI, which virtually everyone recognises and is the target in our remit.
“At some point it would be good to consolidate to focus on one [measure of inflation]”.
The change would mean that savers who invest in inflation-linked gilts would likely earn a lower return. With £311bn of such index-linked gilts in issuance, a 0.7 percentage point change in interest could save the Government in the region of £2.2bn per year.
There is no one measure of “inflation” so discussing which one we should use makes sense.
But there’s a significant difference between issuing new bonds which use the CPI and changing the old bonds in issue to use it.
Actually, I think it would be a great idea to issue the new ones using CPI. Then we can see, from he difference in market prices, what people think about it…..
Deutsche Bank has been forced to defend plans to pay staff bigger bonuses despite racking up a third consecutive net loss for 2017.
A report in German newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung this weekend that Deutsche Bank is planning to more than double its bonus pool to more than one billion euros has sparked a political backlash in the country.
Martin Schulz, leader of the Social Democratic Party, which is in coalition talks with Angela Merkel’s ruling party, said the plan “hurts our solidarity”.
A German government spokesman ratcheted up the pressure further today, warning Deutsche Bank “the company management must of course ask what impression it leaves in public”.
On the one hand, bonuses and pay must be linked to actual results, results which come from the efforts of those gaining the bonuses and pay. That seems like a reasonable structure too. So, stock awards aren’t just because share prices in general rise, but are measured against, say, the stock prices of peers.
All quite fine by me.
So, now we’ve got the bank making a bit of a turnaround. Operating profits are, as I understand it at least, up. But accounting profits are down, into losses. Because of the change in US tax laws. This isn’t something created nor done by the work of those inside the bank now, is it? So bonuses, given the above insistence, should be affected by it or not?
And if the tax changes had added a few billion to the bank’s profit would all be fine with the bonus pool expanding? If not, why the whining now?
Guardian, money and numbers, never a happy combination:
I don’t know what that means. In 2014, 50 Cent released an album called Animal Ambition, and he allowed fans to purchase it using cryptocurrency.
I have never heard of this album. Don’t worry, nor has anyone. The rapper made only 700 bitcoin from the scheme.
That isn’t a lot. Well, it wasn’t. But he apparently forgot to do anything with those 700 bitcoin, and now they have a value of almost $8m (£5.6m).
That’s stupid. I don’t even know how money works any more. What makes it stranger is that 50 Cent filed for bankruptcy in 2015.
Wait, he was broke? Well, at the time, he did Instagram himself sitting next to the word “BROKE” spelled out in piles of $100 bills, so who am I to argue?
But now he is rich again? This is apparently how 50 Cent operates. Before his bankruptcy, he reportedly made $100m when Vitamin Water – one of his early investments – was sold to Coca-Cola. But then he lost all his money. And now he is rich again, all because he forgot about a cryptocurrency that is in the grip of an unsustainable paroxysm of hyperinflation.
Not really sure that something which rises in value is in the grip of inflation. Well, yes, inflates in value, guess so, but usually not used in reference to money, rather the opposite.
Emmanuel Macron, the French president, has said that if the UK leaves the single market, British firms, including from the City, will get less access to Europe than they have now.
Who benefits most? The customer who gets finance or the provider of the finance?
Answers on a postcard to the Elysee.
No, they really shouldn’t have done this:
HSBC said the conduct which led the Department of Justice to issue this second DPA took place between 2010 and 2011 and, according to the document, relates to its handling of a client order by Cairn Energy and financial services it provided to another unnamed company.
The Cairn Energy case included Mark Johnson who, in October, was found guilty of defrauding Cairn over a £3.5bn client order. A jury ruled that he had driven up the value of the pound against the dollar by buying sterling prior to the transaction in order to make a bigger profit for HSBC.
Frontrunning. It’s not that they’ve screwed the market, it’s that they’ve screwed their own client.
HSBC has agreed to pay just over $100m (£72m) in penalties to settle a US Department of Justice probe into currency rigging.
Currency rigging isn’t really right, not the correct description, but a decent fine is.
Consumers face higher prices and new “service charges” as retailers and businesses plan to circumvent the Government’s ban on credit card fees.
From Jan 13, “rip off” fees of up to 3 per cent charged by firms and government bodies when people pay by credit card – ostensibly to off-set charges paid to card companies – will be prohibited.
But The Sunday Telegraph has learned that some retailers and other companies are planning measures to “sneak” around the rules. These include: refusing credit card payments; increasing shelf prices; introducing new “service charges” across the board.
It costs money to run a credit card system. Someone has to pay those costs. Why not the people who use credit cards?
Suspect Trading Leads Germany to Change How It Releases Data
Suspicious patterns in the trading of currency futures, discovered in an analysis by The Wall Street Journal, helped prompt Germany’s statistics agency to stop sending the sensitive economic data to journalists before the figures are publicly available.
The logic runs this way.
German journalists are German professionals. German professionals would never trade on early release information given to them in the course of their lives as German professionals.
European banks will be allowed to operate as normal in the UK after Brexit under plans due to be announced by the Bank of England, according to reports.
The BoE’s plans are said to allow European banks to carry on operating without having to convert their branches in the UK into subsidiaries and without having to adhere to additional regulations.
The disclosure is likely to spark political controversy as it comes after Michel Barnier, the EU’s chief Brexit negotiator, ruled out a special deal to protect the City of London’s ability to trade on the continent.
Do we think it is of benefit to us that EU banks operate here as branches? What’s that? We do? Great, so that’s what we’ll o then.
What Johnny Foreigner does in Johnny Foreign is up to him, isn’t it? That’s rather the point of delinking from Johnny Foreign, no?
President Nicolas Maduro has said Venezuela would launch a cryptocurrency to combat a US-led financial “blockade,” although he provided few clues about how the economically crippled Opec member would pull off the feat.
The solution to hyperinflation always is a new currency. One that is rigidly limited in issuance so that people can have confidence in it. Maybe not a sufficient criterion, but a necessary one.
So, hands up everyone who thinks Maduro is going to launch a currency with a hard and not breakable issuance limit?
Quite, it’s not going to work, is it?
Three senior City bankers are masterminding the launch of a new digital bank focused on shaking up the UK savings market.
The trio is led by Huy Nguyen Trieu, a fintech entrepreneur who led a capital markets team at US bank Citi in London until quitting last summer. He is working on the project with his former colleague Lionel Durix, who remains in a senior Citi role, and Paul Hanks, the former chief technology officer of UK digital bank Atom.
They plan to launch a mobile savings app that uses artificial intelligence to give savers tailored advice and offers “risk-free” products such as Isas and high interest rate savings accounts to help them reach their financial goals.
Mr Nguyen Trieu told The Daily Telegraph: “I left Citi to help build the next Googles in finance. I am totally convinced new financial companies and business models will emerge that we can’t foresee today.”
It might be very successful and all that but it’s just not going to be the Google of anything, let alone finance.
What’s the network effect here? There isn’t one? So, it’s not going to be a Google then, is it?
Why can payday lenders get away with payday robbery? The political heft of big banks.
They’re rather competitors, aren’t they? The banks and the payday lenders?
Angola sovereign wealth fund’s manager used its cash for his own projects
Jean-Claude Bastos de Morais denies conflict of interest as Paradise Papers show he stands to benefit from investments
We are all surprised about that, aren’t we? Dictatorial oil supported country is corrupt?
Gordon Brown saved the world. He really did, bringing world leaders to agree a gigantic fiscal stimulus and bank rescue. But the trouble with saving us from a 1930s-style depression is that people never see what didn’t happen. Few feel gratitude towards the person who prevented the mass unemployment, devastated savings and home repossessions that never poleaxed them.
So saving the banks was a good idea then?
The Treasury Select Committee has questioned a decision by the UK audit watchdog to clear KPMG over its work with HBOS just before its rescue, with chairman Nicky Morgan demanding a full explanation as to why the auditor has been allowed to get off scot-free.
KPMG audited HBOS’s accounts in 2007 under the assumption that market conditions would not worsen and the bank could fund itself, the FRC wrote in its conclusion. However just over six months after the accounts were published Lehman Brothers filed for bankruptcy, causing turmoil in global financial markets, and HBOS was taken over by Lloyds.
“The extreme funding conditions which arose in October 2008 were not anticipated,” the watchdog said, adding that market conditions when the accounts were published in February 2008 did not make the auditor’s assessment of HBOS seem unreasonable.
As the Senior Lecturer keeps insisting, financial markets cannot deal with uncertainty. An audit isn’t really the place to predict implosion of the interbank market, is it? Not that the Senior Lecturer will go onto say that of course…..