From Ezra Klein.
The privatisation of rail:
It adds: “Demand for rail services has increased by nearly 45 per cent between 1996-97 and 2006-07. Last year alone total passenger demand increased by more than 8 per cent. The rapid growth appears to be continuing into 2007-08.”
That’s why I’m mostly unable to get on the train with the strange fascination with this woman. Yes, she’s horrendously wrong and pig-headed and possesses a shocking lack of self-awareness, but I’m a softie and I just end up embarrassed for her.
Sadly, no, not a moment of self-realization. She\’s talking about someone else.
Naming the person at the centre of the royal sex scandal might not be all that wise an idea:
A lawyer who is defending one of the men accused of blackmailing a member of the Royal Family has called for anyone identifying the alleged victim to be prosecuted.
Giovanni Di Stefano, who represents Ian Strachan, an Icelandic socialite, has written to Baroness Scotland, the Attorney General, and Sir Ken Macdonald, the Director of Public Prosecutions, after overseas media were reported to have named the victim.
The lawyer has emphasised that his client never intended to harm the Royal Family, but wanted to alert them to the behaviour of an aide.
Mr Di Stefano claims that he has consulted several QCs and has been told that British authorities could have powers to act against foreign-based broadcasters and websites and issue a European arrest warrant. They could be liable for breaching an English court order guaranteeing anonymity to the blackmail victim and witnesses if their speculation reached Britain.
Mr Di Stefano said: “I am writing to Baroness Scotland and Sir Ken asking them to bring criminal charges against a number of people who have violated the orders of the judge.
“A violation of a contempt of court act is an extraditable offence and I am going to ask for charges to be brought against any newspaper from any jurisdiction that names any people, even if it is the wrong name, because it is in violation of the order.”
Fortunately, I didn\’t. Phew.
The name is pronounced as it looks.
Thanks for that Tyler.
Congratulations to the new holders of the William Webb Ellis Trophy.
Editors everywhere pray for writers like this:
He was the most reliable of contributors. He always filed early and wrote to the length required.
So, do Argentina join the 6 Nations or the Tri-Nations?
France 10 Argentina 34
Ben Mcintyre looks at country music lyrics. Some very good ones of course, but I\’m not sure if he recognises where some of them come from:
on domestic harmony: “Get your biscuits in the oven, and your buns in the bed”;
That\’s Kinky Freidman, of the Texas Jewboys fame (he ran for Governor just recently) and author of the immortal, "They Ain\’t Making Jews Like Jesus No More".
You done stomped on my heart and mashed that sucker flat.
You just sorta, stomped on my aorta.
I think that\’s Lewis Grissom, sports writer for the Atlanta Journal Constitution for many years (and columnist). Certainly, he used a version of that as the title of a book of his: after his heart transplant actually.
But he\’s right in the major point: country lyrics are indeed "No pop musical genre is so adept at self-parody, or so skilled at wordplay and irony."
There\’s a simple enough solution to this:
Falconer, who gave up a lucrative career in the legal profession to give 10 years’ service as a Labour minister, is said to feel that he has a con-tractual entitlement.
According to the Cabinet Office, however, he is entitled to only £52,193. He is also permitted to receive a lump sum, which is yet to be decided, because of his special position as head of the judiciary for the past four years.
As lord chancellor he was entitled to an annual salary and a pension higher than any other cabinet minister, including the prime minister. However, he opted to take the standard salary of a cabinet minister based in the Lords – worth £104,386 last year – rather than his full salary entitlement of £232,900. When he became lord chancellor and constitutional affairs secretary in 2003, after Blair’s “botched” reshuffle, the historic post of lord chancellor was supposed to be abolished. However, a U-turn by the government led to the title being retained.
Those close to him say Falconer does not regard himself as a rich man. “Unlike some of his contemporaries he did not spend years earning a fortune at the bar,” said one source.
A spokesman said: “The payments are now being made to him in line with the PM’s statement of June 19, 2003.” That was the date when it was agreed that Falconer would take the reduced salary of a regular secretary of state.
What pension is Derry Irvine taking?
Forget the general election that wasn\’t – the biggest political event of this autumn is about to take place. The 17th congress of the Chinese Communist party starts tomorrow in Beijing.
Ah so. Will you be launching Operation Commie County then? That the ChiComs allow no voting on their internal affairs should not be an impediment to the Great and the Good of British Liberalism making known their preferences now should it?
And so the great herds of turbo badgers swept majestically down the slopes of our hillsides into the fertile valleys below, there to sweep across the great plains, go twice around the Wrekin and then apply for jobs in the very call-centres of our souls. But not once did such vicissitudes once deter us from our overwhelming desire to pour lukewarm custard over the naked chiropodist held captive in the car park of The Pervert’s Appendage, for today is – as you should all know –
Via Mark Thoma we get Thomas Palley:
"The logic behind classical free trade is that all can benefit when countries specialize in producing those things in which they have comparative advantage."
The logic behind classical free trade is not dependent upon countries specializing. The logic works whether you are talking about people, companies, towns, tribes, cities, regions, countries or continents. To insist on the artificial barriers of the nation state as being a crucial part of the logic is to sell the pass.
The same point comes up in Roberto Unger\’s new book, Free Trade Reimagined (which Palley is riffing off I think):
If countries specialize in what they produce, the whole world can reap the benefits. It is a simple message of enormous power promising both greater riches and more freedom.
I haven\’t finished Unger (he comes up with some excellent points: there\’s one part where by implication he attacks the EU\’s insistence upon standardisation) so I don\’t know what his final solution is. However, if you start by insisting that the logical unit to study trade is the nation state then you end up with the possibility of reaching some very unwelcome solutions. That, for example, Governments have a part to play in creating comparative advantages (something Unger does say). That perhaps they should "manage" trade, that, in short, perhaps the Man in Whetehall does know best.
If you accept the real case for trade, that voluntary exchange benefits (at least in the minds of those doing it) all participants, that is allows the division of labour, there\’s nothing special about countries and nation states as being the unit required to make it work, nor the unit we should consider in our analysis. In fact, once you have accepted the case for trade all you\’re then arguing about is the unit over which it should be free: and there\’s nothing special about countries there at all.
As the once separate countries that now make up the US show, as the currently still sovereign nations of Europe in the EU show.
Welcome to WordPress. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start blogging!