So, just had fibreoptic installed at 100 Mbits.
Sometimes, the BBC asks for me to be on one of their radio shows. They don’t like using VOIP. Prefer – for a “big” show that I go to Faro to a studio where they have an arrangement to do ISDN from studio to studio.
Better sound that way apparently.
So, is there a way to get BBC quality ISDN-like over that 100 Mbits fibreoptic connection?
Skype, Google Voice (?) whatever don’t cut it. Is there something better than that?
And yes, it’s specifically to try to link up with the BBC.
One advertising company is insisting that “Cressida Dick” and “Dick Cheney” are non-allowable pornography. As is the word “sex”.
So, Gutenberg and his printing press. Add that translation of the Bible into the vernacular. The Common Man no longer needed the intercession of the established Church to read God’s word. Which is why printed Bibles in the vernacular were burnt, along with their translators.
Social media allows the direct interaction of the unwashed. Without the intercession of the establishment power structure through the vertical media. No wonder they’re trying to regulate.
And who won first time around? And do we think the result was, after the burnings, a good one or not?
These included the Flo Period & Ovulation Tracker,
No, really, you’ll never guess –
which reportedly shared with Facebook when users were having their periods or when they were trying to become pregnant.
Astonishing really, isn’t it?
Ministers are talking about redefining the role of social networks to hold them directly liable for the content that gets published on their platforms, in effect enshrining them as publishers in law.
It’s making BT responsible for the content of telephone calls.
Something entirely inconsistent with the basic model. Basically, either they can be publishers or we can have social media. It’s not possible to have both.
Google to shut down Google+ after failing to disclose user data leak
Well, yes, that’s the time line. But more to do with the place being a howling wasteland, no?
Such a surprise that a bureaucracy looks for this, eh?
Twelve million people in Britain have been harmed by social media and the internet because online firms escape regulation, the broadcasting watchdog Ofcom will warn on Tuesday.
Sharon White, the regulator’s chief executive, will reveal research showing that one in five people in the UK have experienced harmful content or conduct ranging from bullying and harassment to fraud and violence.
“Harmful content” eh?
Facebook is putting children’s lives at risk by reviving spurious MMR claims, the UK’s top health chiefs have said.
The anti-vaccination sites which promote the fake science that caused a surge in measles cases as well as conspiracy theories about other vaccines appear at the top of searches when parents use Facebook to find information about the MMR vaccine or other vaccinations.
Andrew Wakefield, the discredited doctor behind the fraudulent research linking the MMR vaccine to autism, features prominently on the sites with his film Vaxxed in which he accuses the US government’s Centre for Disease Control and Prevention of a cover-up over the risks.
Unlike Google, which filters out anti-vaccination sites to promote guidance from the NHS, government or World Health Organisation, Facebook’s searches appear to be based solely on their most popular and active sites irrespective of whether they are peddling false information. The biggest anti-vaccination sites have more than 100,000 followers.
The problem here is, well, who gets to decide what is Woo?
Proper examination of detailed claims would show that pretty much any economic plans to the left of Tony Blair are woo for example. Should that be filtered out of Facebook listings? One could go on with many other popular beliefs….
An initiative launched by Facebook and Snapchat to help children combat online bullying has resulted in no calls to a national helpline.
Facebook and Snapchat’s parent company Snap entered into a trial with the NSPCC last year to help young children on their sites who might be subjected to bullying.
Through this initiative, if someone reports that they are being bullied, they will see a message suggesting that they talk to Childline for support and advice. Choosing this option will launch more information and the option to speak to a counsellor.
No one wants to call childline? No one is being bullied? No one pays any attention to anything on Facebook or Snapchat?
Presumably the net step is to demand tax subsidy as it isn’t working.
There is legitimate fear that GDPR will threaten the data-profiling gravy train. It’s a direct assault on the surveillance economy, enforced by government regulators and an army of class-action lawyers. “It will require such a rethinking of the way Facebook and Google work, I don’t know what they will do,” says Jonathan Taplin, author of Move Fast and Break Things, a book that’s critical of the platform economy. Companies could still serve ads, but they would not be able to use data to target someone’s specific preferences without their consent. “I saw a study that talked about the difference in value of an ad if platforms track information versus do not track,” says Reback. “If you just honor that, it would cut the value Google could charge for an ad by 80 percent.”
That is, the value to the advertiser is cut by 80%.
He’s arguing in favour of a reduction in economic efficiency……
Thousands of government websites have been hijacked by hackers to mine cryptocurrency, in a process known as “cryptojacking”, it has emerged.
The sites, including the Information Commissioner’s Office, the Scottish NHS helpline and the Student Loans company – along with hundreds of other central and local government sites – appear to have been running a power-pinching program that uses visitors’ computers to mine cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin or Ethereum.
No, the websites aren’t hijacked. They’re infected. They’re not using the servers to mine, they’re using visitors’ computers.
Sigh. You’d think the young shavers would get this part of the world right, wouldn’t you?
Facebook was yesterday accused of being in an ‘abusive relationship’ with its users, as MPs called for web giants to be regulated.
The culture, media and sport select committee told executives at Facebook, Twitter and Google that they have opened a ‘Pandora’s Box’ of social problems and have become so powerful, it is ‘time for rules’ to keep them in check.
Lots of people are doing something they like doing. Without being guided. By, you know, the Illuminati who ought to guide all. Therefore regulation.
There is nothing else here.
Try this thought experiment. If social media did not exist would these very same people be promoting its use – as properly conceived and managed by themselves – in order to something something?
Given they dropped however much it was on Lily Cole’s thing, yes, they would.
It’s about control by those who should righteously* control, nothing else.
*Definitions of righteously have been known to differ.
Silicon Valley billionaire Marc Benioff has compared the current crisis of trust facing the tech giants to the financial crisis of a decade ago, urging regulators to wake up to the threat from Google, Facebook, and the other dominant firms.
The outspoken entrepreneur accused some of the industry’s most influential bosses of “abdicating responsibility” and being ignorant to how powerful and sophisticated they had become. Regulators now had “have no choice” but to intervene, he said.
To translate: “Regulate my competitors, but not me.”
The call was backed by Sir Martin Sorrell, who said the “Seven Sisters” – Apple, Facebook, Amazon, Google, Microsoft, and China’s Alibaba and Tencent – had become too big. Comparing Amazon founder Jeff Bezos to a modern-day John D Rockafeller, the chief executive of WPP, said “we are now in a position where they need to be regulated”.
I buy my adspace from these people. Regulate them!
The Duchess of Cambridge will today launch a mental health website for schools, to help teachers navigate the mass of unreliable internet advice.
Her information will be so much more reliable…..
OK, so , ALT + 0228 gives ä.
And now the big question. Is there an ANSI code for an i but with a little heart replacing the jot?
Yes, I know, but…..or a Unicode or something?
Specifically want to be able to have a heart as the jot, not as a separate letter or image…..
Facebook is testing moving publishers’ posts out of people’s news feeds unless the companies pay thousands of dollars to reach their audience.
The new format is being tried in six countries, including Slovakia, Serbia and Sri Lanka, and moves any posts that do not come from users’ friends and family into a secondary feed unless they are paid for. Paid promotions still appear in news feeds as normal.
The change could wreck the business models of small publishers who depend on organic sharing on Facebook for a large part of their audience. It could also have a big impact on larger companies such as BuzzFeed that create content designed to go viral on the site, as “likes” cause Facebook’s algorithm to promote them in news feeds.
Critics yesterday accused Facebook of devious tactics, in giving publishers a huge organic reach and only later charging for that audience.
Yes, that’s how it works. You fiddle around until you’re doing something that people want and profit from then you charge them for that.
Saying he would receive far more abuse if he were female, he added: “This is something we should take really seriously. The abuse of women online for sharing their views is a disgrace.”
Saying the large internet companies like Twitter and Facebook must be held accountable, and brought under the same publishing laws as the UK press, Mr Rees-Mogg said: “It is a real digrace of modern society and will discourage women policians from going into it if they are treated the way Jess is.
“It is deeply outrageous.”
The abuse, sure. But the idea that platforms should be publishers, no way. That’s a truly vile idea, like making BT responsible for what is said down a phone line, Royal Mail for the contents of a letter.
Search engines are like cars on motorways with no requirement for brakes, emission controls or seatbelts. The failure to regulate, let alone properly tax, these massive corporations is the grossest lapse of modern government.
Whut? He wants to regulate search engines? Stop them indexing stuff?