OT Tim, but I thought you’d like to see this:
The article explains the many, many problems with “The Lancet’s” Iraq excess deaths reports.
Tim adds: I read that earlier today. The mostimportant criticism seems to be the one that the data was simply made up. Dunno how anyone might go about proving that it was or wasn’t though.
A proper scientist will show his data, Les Roberts will not. His data is therefore suspect. Providing data for review is the responsibility of the scientist.
Name and email are required. Your email address will not be published.
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.