We have an overpowerful executive. We don\’t have sufficient scrutiny of legislative proposals.
So Richard Reeves suggests we should move to a unicameral system.
Genius, absolute friggin\’ genius.
Please, somebody shoot either me or him.
We have an overpowerful executive. We don\’t have sufficient scrutiny of legislative proposals.
So Richard Reeves suggests we should move to a unicameral system.
Genius, absolute friggin\’ genius.
Please, somebody shoot either me or him.
Of course by far the worst legislation we have is the finance legislation – this week shows how few MPs understood what they voted for last year – strangely enough it is finance legislatio that the Lords can’t reject
It doesn’t necessarily follow that a unicameral system provides less oversight. One could say the same about having fewer MPS – ‘we don’t have enough oversight and now he wants fewer MPs’, but I think about the best thing for parliamentary scrutiny would be to have say just 200 MPs.
Unicameralism sounds good to me.
(I trust he is talking about getting rid of the Commons).
Reminds me of the story of George Washington and Jefferson drinking tea.
Comments are closed.