CiF commenters rip into her.
It was Natalie Solent who said:
One way in which consensus opinion changes is when scattered individuals become aware that many others share their opinions.
Might I add a corollary? That the value of CiF is that those who were for decades living in an atmosphere of right on agreement are now faced with the evidence that many others do not share their opinions? That the bubble of groupthink is being pricked?