Hmm, George reads two papers drawing on the same evidence. He then decides that the one with teh catastrophic outcome must be the right one.
And thus society must be turned upside down.
He really doesn\’t seem to get the economists\’ point. That doing these things might (and at the speed that Monbiot is arguing they should be done, will) cost more than not doing them.
That\’s "cost" as in deaths, shortened life spans and general human misery, not just "cost" as in cash.