Quite, and I thought La Cavendish normally does better than this.
As far as I can make out, the “low carbon” mania is only for maniacs, but a source of energy not dependent on thugs, religous fanatics etc would seem good idea, as long as the market proves it reasonably economic.
“Subsidize”?
Monty
Note that some of these systems are already running into trouble, because of exagerated claims about their efficiency:
Quite, and I thought La Cavendish normally does better than this.
As far as I can make out, the “low carbon” mania is only for maniacs, but a source of energy not dependent on thugs, religous fanatics etc would seem good idea, as long as the market proves it reasonably economic.
“Subsidize”?
Note that some of these systems are already running into trouble, because of exagerated claims about their efficiency:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/energy/windpower/4546692/DIY-chain-withdraws-wind-turbines-from-sale.html