Skip to content

Oooh, dearie me

Society is going to the dogs, isn\’t it?

There seems a remarkable degree of consensus on a definition of today\’s social evils. Individualism is top, closely linked to greed and the decline in community; also part of the definition is a sense of decline in values and a deterioration of virtues such as honesty, ­empathy, respect and reciprocity. ­Family breakdown and poor parenting feature, as do misuse of drugs and alcohol, ­inequality and democratic deficit.

Perhaps using a word like \”evil\” inevitably prompts an outpouring of moral horror, but the JRF study, at the high-water mark of the economic boom years, is only amplifying what has been emerging in plenty of other research: a 2007 study claimed that 83% of the UK public felt the country was in moral decline. In January, the European Social Survey claimed that British under-25s have less trust or sense of belonging than in any other country; it was only the more positive attitudes of older age groups – those over 50 – that ensured that Britain didn\’t bump to the bottom of the index below Bulgaria and Slovakia.

That European Social Survey comes from the nef so we know that there\’s something wrong with it.

And a quick eyeballing says that the sense of trust or belonging increases with age right across Europe (there are those places which have high trust all along, but with, as I say, a quick eyeballing, I\’m not seeing trust decline with age). And we shouldn\’t find that all that surprising. Someone who\’s been living in a society for 60 years is more likely to have a sense of trust and belonging with those they have been living with for 60 years than those who are still making their contacts and their way.

So what explains the way in which people then say that everything is getting worse? Simply the standard response to people looking at the young. Society\’s going to the dogs, you know. Been said since Aristotle was a lad. The young kids of today, don\’t trust each other like we wrinklies do. Thus things must be getting worse.

It\’s an extraordinary thing to try and build a political movement on, the observation that the young aren\’t quite grown up yet.

7 thoughts on “Oooh, dearie me”

  1. Most people these days aren’t individualist in the true sense anyway – they’re identikit, spoonfed drones interested in little more than what’s on TV and Heat magazine.

  2. Funny, I see the decline of individualism as a major cause of the decline of the values lamented over.
    Why bother helping others when the state claims it will do so?
    Why bother with community when your neighbours won’t be there, or when the local council claims t o be the centre of community and hinders any attempts at real communities?

    Its the forced collectivism which causes relationships to deteriorate (as opposed to the voluntary collectivism which arises from individualism).

    But you can’t blame the moral arbiters of the ruling class, so lets blame ‘individualism’.

  3. Individualism? What a crock. The British have been insisting on sheeplehood since the end of WWII.

    Interesting aside. I was watching “The Colour of War” over the weekend – a Brit production of WWII in color film. People’s diaries and letters were read from One man wrote (about 1943) that civility was simply disappearing. If you found a source of fresh tomatoes, not only would you not share, you wouldn’t even tell your neighbors you had them. Buses wouldn’t stop, pleople would knock into you on the sidewalk and not apologize, etc.

    By the end of the war, I think the Brits were just completely drained.

  4. I think you’ll find those decrying individualism and complaining about the decline of community are those receiving largess from the taxpayer, and would like more.

    The modern definition of ‘greed’ is ‘wanting to keep what you have earned’.

  5. Last statement

    It’s a commonplace thing

    In the UK, it’s called the labour party

    In france, it’s called Paree

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *