Can art succeed where science is proving insufficient to generate the will to act effectively on climate change?

If you\’re going to do things like this:

In 1982 she planted wheat on two acres of wasteland on Battery Park, two blocks from Wall Street; her harvest was worth £158, produced on land valued at $4.5bn.

No.

There is simply no way that that sort of return on an asset is \”effective\”.

3 thoughts on “No Maddy”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *