Climate change gases, once in the atmosphere, stay there.
Err, no, they don\’t.
If you\’re going to launch a campaign based on sciencey stuff, best if you get the sciencey stuff right in the first place, no?
Climate change gases, once in the atmosphere, stay there.
Err, no, they don\’t.
If you\’re going to launch a campaign based on sciencey stuff, best if you get the sciencey stuff right in the first place, no?
Scientific facts are so reactionary.
Read that and I thought going with ” Some Report is in a Panic about the Environment” has to be the dullest lead story of the year.
What do you expect Tim? It is after all the Age of Stupid.
I find it odd that “green” people are not aware that nearly everything in plants that’s green is because Chlorophyll is green and eating CO2.
Shouldn’t we wait to see the results of the 100 Month campaign before starting yet another new campaign?
That kinda screws the acid rain theory, doesn’t it.
We’re gonna build gert big nukes … everywhere, and the problem will be solved by engineers. What’s all the fuss about?
Come on Tim, this is the Grauniad we’re talking about here. My landlady’s cat knows more about the science of climatology than all their contributors put together.