Critique of the dayOctober 15, 2009 Tim WorstallArt2 CommentsAnd once you\’ve accepted that Tracey is the art world\’s Chantelle or Jade Goody, Mark Hudson. previousIt\’s a common view, certainly BryonynextI\’m not convinced 2 thoughts on “Critique of the day” Pingback: …..it’s art Jim, but not as we know it « And there was me thinking….. Luis Enrique October 15, 2009 at 3:10 pm It’s puzzling. One might have thought that a large change in “reputation” would require a large change in “information” – but what new information about Damien Hirst has been revealed here? That he’s a rubbish painter. Did anybody ever imagine that (most) conceptual artists weren’t rubbish painters? I really do not see why evidence that Damien Hirst is a rubbish painter should change anybody’s opinion of him. But of course, it’s not about what you can do, it’s about what you choose to do, and whether what you choose to do coincides with prevailing notions of what makes highly valued art, and he’s shocked everybody by choosing to do something he’s no good at. Leave a Reply Cancel replyYour email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment Name * Email * Website Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.