Timmy ElsewhereFebruary 24, 2010 Tim Worstallclimate change2 CommentsIn the Express. Even if the climate science is correct, and awful lot of what we\’re told we must do about it isn\’t. previousSniggernextDutch subtitles for the Shawshank Redemption 2 thoughts on “Timmy Elsewhere” knirirr February 24, 2010 at 10:00 am It’s nice to see such a view being put forward – thanks. Dave Tufte February 25, 2010 at 2:55 am Stern’s number is on the high side, because it’s generally agreed that his discount rates are too low. Nordhaus’ assumptions are more reasonable, and he comes up with a tax of about that much per gallon. Leave a Reply Cancel replyYour email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment Name * Email * Website Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Dave Tufte February 25, 2010 at 2:55 am Stern’s number is on the high side, because it’s generally agreed that his discount rates are too low. Nordhaus’ assumptions are more reasonable, and he comes up with a tax of about that much per gallon.
It’s nice to see such a view being put forward – thanks.
Stern’s number is on the high side, because it’s generally agreed that his discount rates are too low.
Nordhaus’ assumptions are more reasonable, and he comes up with a tax of about that much per gallon.