Look, I know I make fun of the man but there is a reason:
I am incredibly worried about the impact of debt on society. No one is free when in debt.
This is said by the man who insists that we should borrow more money (through the government) in order to have further fiscal expansion.
So, can we objectively say that he wishes to increase our debts so as to reduce our freedom?
Or would that just be me being this appalling neo-liberal type who asks for consistency?
And barbequed babies, of course, for everyone knows that neo-liberals insist upon those.
I would have left this snark there but of course Ritchie doesn\’t allow people like me to sully his blog any more.