Most of you don\’t agree with me.
But this is a good laying out of the climate change thing from the frontline I think.
Note my comment there: I\’m perfectly happy to take the climate science, at this very basic level, as being valid. What pisses me off is the following:
1) Those who would use the IPCC to prove that we should do something are insistent on not listening to what the economists at the IPCC say we should do.
2) Those who would use their credentials as climate scientists to tell us what we should do in economics: no, I don\’t listen to economists trying to explain hydrology to me so why on earth is anyone listening to hydrologists on matters economic?