Skip to content

More UKuncut nonsense

We had talks outside Lehman Brothers’ old headquarters, expressed our solidarity with USUncut outside the Bank of America who paid $0 in tax last year….

So, err, why did Bank of America pay $0 in tax last year?

Umm, 2010 results:

Bank of America posted a $2.24 billion net loss

2009 results?

income applicable to common shareholders was a net loss of $2.2 billion, or $0.29 per diluted share.

BoA didn\’t pay any corporate income tax because there wasn\’t any corporate income to pay tax on.

Are these uncut people all irredeemably stupid?

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

14 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dick
Dick
14 years ago

“Are these uncut people all irredeemably stupid?”

Are you starting a new series? “Questions to which the answer is ‘yes’.”

Noel Scoper
Noel Scoper
14 years ago

Tax Research LLP pays £0 in tax every year

Dennis the Peasant
14 years ago

The question answers itself, Tim.

Johnathan Pearce
Johnathan Pearce
14 years ago

Shooting fish in a barrel.

Bilbao boy
Bilbao boy
14 years ago

I get the feeling that emotional, economically illiterates have grabbed the lefty journalists’ imaginations and are being hyped into something special.

Basically, they want to undermine every working rule our society has based on a stupid prejudice. Pay tax when there is no income??? Yeah. Let’s see if I understand this. You are out of a job, have no money and the taxman comes round to say ‘hey, pay up big boy. We want tax’. Like it?

Their heroes (yeah, makes you laugh dunnit?) do the same as everbody else. Avoidance (understood as organising yourself within, I repeat for the ‘hearing challenged’, WITHIN, the rules that the government hands down to pay as little tax as possible) is merely administering your monies correctly. As bloggers are pointing out. You can always pay more. Why don’t you? Because we have discovered you don’t. Maybe many aren’t even tax-payers yet. Wait till you get your first pay packet, kiddies.

Changing the rules (which successive governments have made incredibly complex) requires parliament. And even though I have no faith in our lords and masters, at least they will require things to be fully thought through before changing rules.

Seen from a distance, UKUncut are merely a bunch of ignorant poseurs who want something done about ‘unfairness’. They feel, so they must be right. They are indignant, so they must be right. They care, so they are right.

The rest of us are nasty sh*ts, ‘cos we obviously do not care!

May the Lord help all who live on the good ship UK.

Dez Richardson
Dez Richardson
14 years ago

Paying an amout of tax which is unrelated to profit/loss? Sounds like they want a poll tax… but just for businesses, of course.

Paul Power
Paul Power
14 years ago

Don’t forget tax incidence. Even when a business is liable for tax it does not pay any money.

Robbo
Robbo
14 years ago

Nil tax ? I don’t think so. IIRC banks can’t reclaim the VAT they pay on all their expense purchases, plus of course they will pay business rates, and Employers NICs. I’m not sure if there are other taxes too.

Emil
Emil
14 years ago

” Sounds like they want a poll tax… but just for businesses, of course.”

That should say only for the (nasty evil) multinational businesses, but not for the ones we like: the charities, NGOs, unions, the ones saying things we like or doing ‘socially useful stuff’*, etc

“Socially useful stuff” is basically whatever the lefties like

Rob
Rob
14 years ago

I think they see the whole tax on profits/income thing as some sort of dodge.

Personally though, i think they are a bunch of Far Left loonies and exhibitionists who just hate business, especially American ones.

Ian
Ian
14 years ago

What is it about these tax obsessed people ?

Why do we pay tax in the first place ? We use it to fund those providing public services. But it can be demonstrated beyond doubt that large numbers of people are receiving tax money for doing very little, or are receiving way too much tax money, or there are too many of them, or the services being provided should not be funded by tax.

So their solution – get some more tax ?!

This is myopia on a grand scale.

London Calling
London Calling
14 years ago

Tom Costello, ex Oxbridge “founder” of UKUncut describes himselt as a “playwright”
I can only assume he has yet to make a tax return for any profit he makes from people paying to attend any plays he has written, probably because there aren’t any.

Though I read somewhere he is only an aspiring playwright, as he works as a BBC researcher. Maybe that was incorrect, but no doubt the Tamsin and Jonty faux-levellers who invaded Fortnums will devote much of their future trust-funded wellbeing to paying more tax than they are required to?

Rob
Rob
14 years ago

Ian, tax isconfiscation of assets from class enemies. Ask any socialist what they prefer – confiscatory tax rates with reduced yield, or lower rates with more money raised, and they will choose the former.

Katabasis
14 years ago

What is really starting to worry me is how violent the language is becoming. There are plenty of explicit threats being made against people openly critical of ukuncut and fellow travellers (and especially those openly supporting the Rally Against Debt), and I know it’s primarily online via social media. But – ukuncut’s language has always been subtly violent e.g. “make them pay” – and we’ve already seen how that turns out for some of their hate figures.
And contrary to ukuncut propaganda, and which the media seems to have forgotten too, is the fact that shops WERE attacked on ukuncut actions many times before March 26th….

14
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x