Eric Augenbraun: Spouting Bullshit

A piece about food stamps. The US program which gives poor people vouchers to purchase food.

It\’s all about how what bastards the right are for thinking to cut this program.

You know what\’s actually missing from it?

A discussion of how the program has been expanded in recent years.

There might well be a need for more such support. There might be a need for less. But to howl that a minor cut is appalling while not pointing out that it\’s not even a reversal of the recent expansion is to spout bullshit.

3 thoughts on “Eric Augenbraun: Spouting Bullshit”

  1. So Much For Subtlety

    Pat Buchanan may be an unpleasant person with some unpleasant views (although I don’t know about the former) but when he is right, he is right:

    “The lessons of history … show conclusively that continued dependence upon relief induces a spiritual and moral disintegration fundamentally destructive to the national fiber. To dole out relief in this way is to administer a narcotic, a subtle destroyer of the human spirit.”

    These searing words about Depression-era welfare are from Franklin Roosevelt’s 1935 State of the Union Address. FDR feared this self-reliant people might come to depend permanently upon government for the necessities of their daily lives. Like narcotics, such a dependency would destroy the fiber and spirit of the nation.

    What brings his words to mind is news that 41.8 million Americans are on food stamps, and the White House estimates 43 million will soon be getting food stamps every month.

    A seventh of the nation cannot even feed itself.

    If you would chart America’s decline, this program is a good place to begin. As a harbinger of the Great Society to come, in early 1964, a Food Stamp Act was signed into law by LBJ appropriating $75 million for 350,000 individuals in 40 counties and three U.S. cities.

    Yet, no one was starving. There had been no starvation since Jamestown, with such exceptions as the Donner Party caught in the Sierra Nevada in the winter of 1846-47, who took to eating their dead.

    The Food Stamp Act became law half a decade after J.K. Galbraith in his best-seller had declared 1950s America to be the world’s great Affluent Society.

    Yet, when Richard Nixon took office, 3 million Americans were receiving food stamps at a cost of $270 million. Then CBS ran a program featuring a premature baby near death, and told us it was an infant starving to death in rich America. The nation demanded action, and Nixon acted.

    By the time he left office in 1974, the food stamp program was feeding 16 million Americans at an annual cost of $4 billion.

    Fast forward to 2009. The cost to taxpayers of the U.S. food stamp program hit $56 billion. The number of recipients and cost of the program exploded again last year.

    Among the reasons is family disintegration. Forty percent of all children in America are now born out of wedlock. Among Hispanics, it is 51 percent. Among African-Americans, it is 71 percent.

    Food stamps make the situation worse. Like most welfare. We need to radically change the system to make sure this does not continue.

  2. There’s a case to be made for maintaining a level of welfare sufficient to stave off absolute inanition. Apart from anything, poor people dying in the street is just plain unhygienic, and it smells awful. Beyond that, bollocks. Augenbraun talks about ‘belt-tightening’. I’ve seen America’s poor. A calorie reduction sufficient to merit taking in the belt a couple of notches would do most of them no end of good. No-one’s starving in America, and the only way anyone’s going to starve is if the wholesale bilking of the system isn’t curtailed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *