“For it turns out that WG3 (in the tangled jargon of the IPCC reports, the “what we ought to be doing” bit) has actually been written by Greenpeace.”
Wrong as usual (whenever you talk about climate, that is). In this context, WGIII report means the one alongside the WGI report in the IPCC assessment. But we’re not talking about that report at all, merely about some subsiduary report.
“For it turns out that WG3 (in the tangled jargon of the IPCC reports, the “what we ought to be doing” bit) has actually been written by Greenpeace.”
Wrong as usual (whenever you talk about climate, that is). In this context, WGIII report means the one alongside the WGI report in the IPCC assessment. But we’re not talking about that report at all, merely about some subsiduary report.
Eliding all that via your headlines is dishonest.
Bullseye! Got a Connolley obfuscation:
http://www.financialpost.com/opinion/columnists/story.html?id=62e1c98e-01ed-4c55-bf3d-5078af9cb409