Alongside this, we need 100% transparency on how energy bills are calculated, so huge price rises can\’t be hidden behind rising wholesale prices.
I\’m afraid that I do have to admit, sexist, patronising and not very feminist at all curmudgeon that I am, that I rate Ms. Berger more for her looks than her brains.
But this does sound like an absolutely excellent idea. Let us put onto bills, in great detail, the amount that everyone is paying for the green delusions of our power supply system.
Regular readers will know that I\’m in agreement that climate change is a problem, a problem we should do something about. But that what we are doing is an insane set of things to do about this admitted problem.
So let the cost of the renewables obligation be on bills. Let\’s add the Stern Review\’s estimate of the costs of climate change. Let\’s show people that what is being done is costing more than the benefits that will flow from it.
Let\’s really detail the osts of those windmills, the feed in tariffs to Jeremy Leggett, let\’s show the one third (is that currently or in the future? I forget) of power bills that Greenpeace et al are responsible for.
That is what Ms. Berger is suggesting, isn\’t it?