Just Thinking makes an interesting point.
Few to none have been charged with riot: as I\’ve been saying, this might well mean that there wasn\’t in fact a riot and thus the rozzers not having to pay for the damage caused in those not riots.
What slightly worries me is that Frank Dobson thinks this a possible reason for there being no charges of riot: which makes me question my own first surmise. As would agreeing with Frank Dobson on anything.
However, we seem to be getting from the government that this won\’t change the situation under the Riot Damages Act.
Hmm, I dunno give the bureaucrats a loophole and they\’ll drive a truck through it.