Jersey\’s zero ten policy approved

He won’t approve, of course. I wonder how many blogs he’ll write complaining that the EU has caved in on this? Blog count on the Swiss tax deal is about ten, I think…..

Isn’t Ritchie adamant about everything ?

As I ‘ve said before :

begriffsstutzig

(a very sad translation to English is : obtuse! Just does not have the same ring. Untranslatable, like Schadenfreude.

Alan Douglas

@ Alan

‘Grok-proof’?

Murphy is now trying his hardest to bluster the way through the fact he is wrong (again). Why do the same idiots continue to believe his drivel?

Worzel
You’re right. He opened up the shameless IoM VAT issue which enabled IoM to lead with zero ten. He then offered to advise Jersey that what they were doing wouldn’t be acceptable, and maintained that stance despite extreme hostility.

What he didn’t predict was the EU Code of Conduct passing it through without the ‘harmful’ aspect, without bearing in mind the local consequences that the increased deficit would land on the tax paying population.

I say it’s a worthy cause. But who cares about worthy when you can spit at someone.

No ratification of the structure from ECOFIN til December. Enough time for Jersey and IoM to laugh while they increase the taxes on the poor, to support a craven industry that believes hiding criminality successfully and pissing on the public as a game.

So Arnald he was certain that the EU would reject it but didn’t predict that they wouldn’t and that makes him right. Did he do the tax returns for Bellman ?

Thornavis

You were obviously born yesterday on this topic, and are stupidly mimicking the soggy biscuit brigade on here too. Go on, eat it. If they knew anything they wouldn’t crow.

But then you must also enjoy the break up of societies due to corps sucking up the public money in order to keep it rather than use it, cos it’s liberal yeah. Like big finance is doing you a favour…..oh wait, your mouth is full.

Now. Where’s the evidence against, pedants.

The soggy biscuit brigade, you’ve lost me there old chap. Actually Arnald had you been paying attention you would realise that my less than serious comment was aimed mostly at you and your odd reasoning in support of Murphy, the “What I tell you three times is true” defence.

Ah yes I’d, mercifully, forgotten that lovely cultural practice. I will have to grant that, on that subject, Arnald obviously has far greater knowledge than I.

Arnald,

What about Jersey’s ‘poor’ when they take away our primary source of income as RedRitchie would suggest ?

The truth is the left couldn’t give a shit about the ‘poor’. They are just pawns in your game of fantasy socialism, where simpletons like you believe you make the poor richer by making the rich poorer. The belief that Government should be the primary determinant of the allocation of assets within an economy, in the name of such things as ‘Social Justice’, is why the UK and their ilk have mismanaged economies to the extent that 50% plus tax rates are required. If the banks are guilty of anything, it is that their success, and tax contribution, over the years that have enabled this level of mismanagement.

You can’t do anything about the fact that Companies and individuals have the freedom to use legal methods to decide not to enable Governments to further perpetuate this mismanagement, so why not focus upon the enablers such as union bullies and bleeding heart moralistic blackmailers, instead of perpetually criticising those whose taxes you would advocate be squandered further by placing ever-increasing amounts in the hands of government.

If the OECD and the EU continue to come down in favour of Jersey, I guess we can live with irritating worms like yourself and Murphy, whose true politics are simply those of envy.

Oh , and to bring it down to your usual level of debate, you can also go fuck yourself.

Oi! Gilly! You’re hilarious!

Arnald, you see only costs to society, I see 50 years of financial contribution to society which has enabled government squander.

As to your inflammatory nonsense about living under an unelected government. ? I have lived under a government that has been substantially financed by tax receipts from your despised industry, but if you can come up with an alternative to the financial services industry’s tax receipts, please let us all know.

It’s pedantic little idealist numpties like yourself that, indirectly, suck up benefits provided by the very industry you would like to destroy.

Utter bollocks Thornavis. The industries that benefit from lax government regulation are the ones that advise the government.

As for Worzel. Words fail me. I don’t know where you’re from, but I imagine the infrastructure that got you where you are (as an insufferable sociopath) would not have existed if your extremist views had been prevalent.

Go read a book dickhead.

Right Arnald so the poor old governments are at the mercy of the people who advise them they have no ability to determine the right thing to do and simply do what they’re told ? Not much point in having them then is there ?

Sociopath. Interesting diagnosis. Thank you doctor. I’ll certainly claim some of these, but a frightening number seem to hit a little closer to (your) home. Heal thyself and all that.

An air of self importance, regardless of their true standing in society
Quick to lose their temper
Belligernent and bullying manner
Lack the ability to empathise with others
Need for stimulation
Poor behavioural controls
Authoritarian
Paranoid
lack of Realistic life plan
Remorsely Vindictive when thwarted or exposed
Appeals to the pity of others
Professes to act for the good of others

The best of Murphy’s prognostications still has to be:

“Let’s ignore the nonsense – the reality is there is no debt crisis – even in Greece”

http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2010/03/05/lets-ignore-the-nonsense-the-reality-is-there-is-no-debt-crisis-even-in-greece/