In which I am taken to task by someone who knows what he is talking aboutNovember 23, 2011 Tim WorstallFinance3 CommentsMakes an interesting change actually, criticism from someone who actually knows stuff. previousThis is not, I think, about what they say it\’s aboutnextSorry, they\’re still barking mad 3 thoughts on “In which I am taken to task by someone who knows what he is talking about” Tracy W November 23, 2011 at 12:55 pm Indeed, what is the Internet coming too? Frances Coppola November 23, 2011 at 5:01 pm But Tim, you were only wrong in one respect. Someone else was “completely” wrong. Since the analysis of market volatility effects nearly qualifies as rocket science, most people are likely to be wrong in some respect. And as I don’t like to be wrong, that’s why I haven’t commented on the effect of FTT on market volatility. You are braver than me. H Doodson November 23, 2011 at 9:21 pm “Murphy is completely wrong, except perhaps under some definition of volatility known only to himself. Worstall is wrong in stating a definite answer to the question not supported by the evidence he cites.” So Murphy needs to shut up and you need to include more citations that add to the debate? Leave a Reply Cancel replyYour email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment Name * Email * Website Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.