OK, reasonably trivial I agree but still.
If you search for \”Apple Boycott\” (with or without the quote marks) on Google the first piece that comes up is \”Apple Boycott: People Are Spouting Nonsense about Chinese Manufacturing\”.
The second is \”The Apple Boycott Graphically Explained\”.
These two pieces, umm, by me, are about the absurdity of the complaints over the conditions there.
These results come in ahead of the pages actually trying to organise a boycott of Apple.
This drives certain types into rage which is all very amusing. And I know of their rage because they write to me and tell me so.
I\’m even being accused of \”seeding Google\” when actually all I did was write a piece and then people tweeted it. Which is actually how the system is supposed to work, isn\’t it?
As seen by the latest outpouring from an enormously fat, over-privileged luvvie.
Who doesn’t seem to have bothered to read anything you have posted either here, or on Forbes, since 2nd Feb. Which might be why he thinks he:
and you have
As I posted on the latest Forbes article, taking the start of Mike’s show run as a decent point for the graph:
Oh, sod, forgot to close the a tag. Preview button, pretty please?