Have we reached a watershed? Can anyone other than pornographers justify printing pictures of naked women when there has been such an uproar over the topless pictures of the Duchess of Cambridge?
It\’s a simple matter of acknowledging human beings as they are. The male of the species enjoys looking at nekkid baps. Indeed, there is strong (although perhaps not conclusive) evidence that baps are there for men to enjoy. Other primates suckle their young with very similar milk glands but without the presence of protuberant titties after all.
And one of the hallmarks of a free society, of a liberal one, is that people should be able to and indeed can get on with what they enjoy as long as that enjoyment is not coming from direct harm to either the persons or rights of others.
And no, being made uncomfortable doesn\’t cut it.
Thus, yes, nekkid baps, they are printable, as long as it is with the consent of the owner of said titties. And most certainly, you do not get to say what any other woman gets to do with her baps, photoed, pictured, printed or not.