Timmy elsewhereJuly 26, 2013 Tim WorstallTimmy Elsewhere2 CommentsAt the ASI. The $60 trillion costs of Arctic methane are pretty small really. previousThat\’s where a quarter of all the money goesnextA question about Bitcoins and other digital currencies 2 thoughts on “Timmy elsewhere” bloke in france July 26, 2013 at 10:06 am Eight hundred years ago it was warmer than the IPCC’s predicted warming in the 21st century. Presumably these Arctic Ocean and Siberian permafrost methane traps were venting off then too. So these trillion dollar methane bombs have basically been made in half a millennium. How amazing is that? VftS July 26, 2013 at 11:00 am But it’s bollocks anyway. See e.g. http://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/methane-hydrates-and-contemporary-climate-change-24314790 http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/07/16/nature-puts-methane-hydrate-fears-to-rest-says-it-will-be-1000-years-before-they-make-any-impact/ http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/07/24/an-alarmist-prediction-so-bad-even-gavin-schmidt-thinks-it-is-implausible/ http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/07/25/gavin-on-why-the-arctic-methane-alarm-is-implausible/ Leave a Reply Cancel replyYour email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment Name * Email * Website Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.