Ritchie’s looking for another taxpayer teat

Three things follow from that observation. The first is that the PAC needs a much bigger budget to do its work properly.

That bigger budget to employ one of the country’s leading tax experts no doubt.

7 thoughts on “Ritchie’s looking for another taxpayer teat”

  1. I’m fairly sure Richie has more money than at least 80% of the population. Let’s rob him and give it to the poor. Sorry, I meant “more fairly distribute wealth in society”.

  2. So let’s follow that through:

    A committee who’s remit is to scrutinise public accounts, to ensure acccountability and value for money for the public as it were, wants, no NEEDS, more public money.

    Ritchienomics.

  3. Whoever this quote is from is talking nonsense. They are suggesting that the PAC is not doing its work properly. Which of course it is.

    The PAC’s job is to scrutinise public expenditure which is why it primarily investigates the tax affairs of private sector businesses.

    If that’s not doing their job properly, I don’t know what is!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *