Love as in it irritates me enormously.
The low voice of men, like stags, is a trait that probably evolved through sexual selection. This isn’t just about being attractive to the opposite sex, it’s also about beating same-sex rivals. A deep voice may prove an advantage in both cases, helping a man to exclude other, apparently less dominant men, from the mating game, as well as making him more attractive to the opposite sex. A win-win situation.
They’re right up there with evolution, the lefty papers happily publish bits telling us the implications of it all.
And then the other 90% of said papers are all about how horrible the results are and how we shouldn’t be doing the things that evolution means we do do. Men are more interested in looks than women, they being more interested in status. This flows directly from the basic bits about being a mammal with a long gestation and even longer child rearing process. And we can go on and on in pointing out which parts of our nature various lefties will pooh pooh.
It’s the acceptance of evolution and the subsequent railing against the implications of it that so pisses me off. Lad’s mags? Evolution. Screwing around? Evolution. An interest in Ya Yas? Evolution.