That some American billionaire might have some under age totty following him about which he “abuses” because they’re under the age of 18?
Sure, I believe that that can and does happen. I’d be astonished if it didn’t in fact, althogh setting the bar for abuse at 18 seems a little high for me. 14, 15, 16, maybe, as an age of consent, but 18 does sound a little patriarchal.
Do I go on to believe that this is then part of a pimping operation where Princes and Prime Ministers, senior lawyers and the rest are cheaperoned into these 17 year olds by the daughter of a disgraced and bankrupt former billionaire (the only one of this cast I’ve actually met just BTW)?
No, no, I really don’t think I do.
I don’t say categorically that it could not or did not happen. But jeez, there’s enough young women out there on the game that an organisation like this most surely isn’t necessary is it? Something so dangerous?