Woo! Nice ankles!September 12, 2015 Tim WorstallFeminism30 Comments Is it ‘coz I is sexist? previousRitchie gets a tongue bath from The GnextMs. Proudman 30 thoughts on “Woo! Nice ankles!” Ironman September 12, 2015 at 8:36 am I wonder what she’s wearing underneath that black dress. C’mon Darlin’, show us. Machiavelli September 12, 2015 at 8:39 am By that look on her face Ironman, a huge black strap on. Theophrastus September 12, 2015 at 8:40 am The more I read about this individual the more unpleasant she sounds. Her feminism and commitment to human rights seem to be a form of therapy for her compound grievances and neuroses. She’s a poster girl for the psychopathology of leftist feminism. Mr Ecks September 12, 2015 at 9:08 am She is physically unattractive and a frankly appalling person. Still can’t understand why the original bloke wanted to pay a compliment in the first place. Steve September 12, 2015 at 9:43 am Yeesh. I can see why she opted for the glamour shot on her Linkydinky. Steve September 12, 2015 at 9:46 am Mr Ecks – Still can’t understand why the original bloke wanted to pay a compliment in the first place. Same reason I smile at the girlies on the till at Waitrose. Not Asda though. They only employ mutant chavs. Jim September 12, 2015 at 9:46 am I think that one thing has been proved in all this – whoever took that photo did a job of great professionalism, because having seen the whole package he or she did very well to create an attractive picture. So in fact the original statement of ‘stunning photo!!’ is in fact 100% correct, it is indeed a stunning photo that manages to make a rather plain dumpy woman look alluring. The pic in the Daily Mail gives a better overall view of the ‘lady’ in question: http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/09/10/23/2C268B9400000578-0-image-a-19_1441922929849.jpg Jim September 12, 2015 at 9:48 am Put it this way – if you arranged a date with the woman in the LinkedIn photo, you’d be a bit pissed off when the one in the Daily Mail turned up…………. Surreptitious Evil September 12, 2015 at 10:03 am Folks, you better hope that “in the particular circumstances the pursuit of the course of conduct was reasonable” 😉 Theophrastus September 12, 2015 at 10:08 am Steve: Iceland hires the hominids that Asda rejects. Theophrastus September 12, 2015 at 10:10 am Ecksy: “Still can’t understand why the original bloke wanted to pay a compliment in the first place.” Well, as the old saying goes, you don’t have to look at the clock on the mantelpiece when you are stoking the fire… bloke in spain September 12, 2015 at 10:22 am A 3. Possibly a 2 https://youtu.be/hKWmFWRVLlU Bloke no Longer in Austria September 12, 2015 at 10:34 am Steve, you wanna hang out at the Waitrose in Sunningdale, Berkshire – phwoar! Knees ! What are her knees like ? Steve September 12, 2015 at 10:35 am Theo – I went into an Iceland once. It’s the closest I’ve come to being on the Jeremy Kyle show without getting a face tattoo and seven illegitimate kids. dearieme September 12, 2015 at 10:35 am She’s demented. The poor soul is bonkers, doolally, nuts. Steve September 12, 2015 at 10:41 am Bloke no Longer in Austria – it really does give you extra incentive to pop in for some sun-dried tomatoes. Theophrastus September 12, 2015 at 10:53 am BiS: I’d say 3; but she’s off the scale on the crazy axis. The Stigler September 12, 2015 at 10:58 am I miss the days when women would dress up at work. It’s all jeans and knitwear now. Andrew September 12, 2015 at 11:06 am I would. From behind. Probably promise to call but wouldn’t. Andrew K September 12, 2015 at 11:20 am How do you like your rabbit cooked? Jonathan September 12, 2015 at 11:23 am She’s not crazy, just positioning herself for a nice job with feminist grievance-mongering org. then into politics with a history of ‘Championing Womens Rights’. Jonathan September 12, 2015 at 11:24 am Oh, she is very plain but a least she’s not a fatty – yet. bloke in spain September 12, 2015 at 11:30 am @Theo I gather the crazy axis is log. Not too sure about the line, either. Research date would seem to indicate positive correlation between hot & crazy. And there must be some explanation for the total munters some blokes appear to be happily married to. bloke in spain September 12, 2015 at 11:32 am data. not date. Confusing the research outcome with the research method, there. Must try harder. dearieme September 12, 2015 at 11:53 am She really is a loonie. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3231741/Charlotte-Proudman-reduced-grandmother-tears-Facebook-rant.html Kevin B September 12, 2015 at 12:19 pm Look chaps, show a little chivalry here. She was clearly having her period when she made that big fuss and you know how hysterical the poor dears get when they’re on the rag. Theophrastus September 12, 2015 at 12:35 pm dearieme: where you see “loonie”, and I see “neurotic with daddy issues”, she (and her femiloon comrades) see “principled” and “(righteously) angry”. Theophrastus September 12, 2015 at 3:35 pm BiS; Never mind the typos, that link is priceless! Thank you. Tim Newman September 12, 2015 at 5:50 pm Put it this way – if you arranged a date with the woman in the LinkedIn photo, you’d be a bit pissed off when the one in the Daily Mail turned up…………. Heh! johnny bonk September 14, 2015 at 7:52 pm I would if she let me, and I bet most of the bloggers on here saying they wouldn’t would, but none of us will ever know. Leave a Reply Cancel replyYour email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment Name * Email * Website Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.