5 thoughts on “Democrats are better at fucking you”
K.R. Lohse
Yours. And they’ll tell you it’s for your own good while they’re doing it.
The Inimitable Steve
Obviously JFK and Bubba were legendary bandersnatches in their day, but of the current crop of presidential contenders:
Democrats:
* Hilldog – being handy with a frozen Mars bar doesn’t count.
* Bernie – probably needs a fistful of blue pills and a picture of Jane Fonda to make the tortoise come out of its shell.
Republicans:
* Trump – he may be orange and have shredded wheat hair, but for some reason gorgeous younger women throw themselves at the smirking alpha male billionaire.
* Ted Cruz – allegedly gets into more Nat King than Ernie Els.
So I think the GOP is winning.
John square
I think PJ O’Rourke was more correct.
Liberal Yank
Does this mean that the race to create the stupidest laws is merely compensating?
If so then let’s give all the wankers a Ferrari and have someone that isn’t overly concerned with their performance in bed write useful laws.
So Much For Subtlety
I would comment on the awful methodology of that survey but there doesn’t appear to be one. Also I was distracted by the articles on the sidebar including this one:
As common as shaking hands? You don’t say. I am sure there is a downside to that. Let me think.
Beyond that, I was concerned about the dynamics around oral sex: the morass of obligations, pressures, and judgments leveled at girls; the calculus and compromises they made to curry favor with boys while remaining emotionally, socially, and even physically “safe”; the lack of reciprocity or physical pleasure they described, or expected.
So a fat Jewish feminist finds that if you give freedom to young girls, they make decisions she does not agree with.
Welcome to middle age honey. Yenta-dom beckons.
At least conservatives are, more or less, consistent. Don’t like cheap exploitative sexual encounters? Tell girls not to do it. Don’t keep pretending there is this unicorn out there somewhere of the perfect sexual act that does not involve a wedding ring, three children and a house in the suburbs.
Yours. And they’ll tell you it’s for your own good while they’re doing it.
Obviously JFK and Bubba were legendary bandersnatches in their day, but of the current crop of presidential contenders:
Democrats:
* Hilldog – being handy with a frozen Mars bar doesn’t count.
* Bernie – probably needs a fistful of blue pills and a picture of Jane Fonda to make the tortoise come out of its shell.
Republicans:
* Trump – he may be orange and have shredded wheat hair, but for some reason gorgeous younger women throw themselves at the smirking alpha male billionaire.
* Ted Cruz – allegedly gets into more Nat King than Ernie Els.
So I think the GOP is winning.
I think PJ O’Rourke was more correct.
Does this mean that the race to create the stupidest laws is merely compensating?
If so then let’s give all the wankers a Ferrari and have someone that isn’t overly concerned with their performance in bed write useful laws.
I would comment on the awful methodology of that survey but there doesn’t appear to be one. Also I was distracted by the articles on the sidebar including this one:
http://www.salon.com/2016/04/02/its_a_blow_job_because_its_work_how_guys_push_women_to_make_oral_sex_as_common_as_shaking_hands/
As common as shaking hands? You don’t say. I am sure there is a downside to that. Let me think.
So a fat Jewish feminist finds that if you give freedom to young girls, they make decisions she does not agree with.
Welcome to middle age honey. Yenta-dom beckons.
At least conservatives are, more or less, consistent. Don’t like cheap exploitative sexual encounters? Tell girls not to do it. Don’t keep pretending there is this unicorn out there somewhere of the perfect sexual act that does not involve a wedding ring, three children and a house in the suburbs.