The Delhi High Court has termed it “very unfortunate” that an appeal regarding a property dispute was pending before it for over 30 years and no satisfactory solution was found despite the fact that 75 judges have heard the matter.
The Delhi High Court has termed it “very unfortunate” that an appeal regarding a property dispute was pending before it for over 30 years and no satisfactory solution was found despite the fact that 75 judges have heard the matter.
Well it has provided a great living for a large number of lawyers and judges over the years.
So not that different from the UK except more obvious
Shades of Jarndyce v Jarndyce
How many Indian judges does it take to change a light bulb?
Sounds like none of the bribes was sufficiently large.