Shot to their deaths, eh?June 12, 2016 Tim WorstallNewspaper Watch38 Comments Haaretz See realtime coverage What Drives Palestinian Women Shot at Israeli Checkpoints to Their Deaths? previousErr, what?nextThe assault rifle used in Orlando 38 thoughts on “Shot to their deaths, eh?” Matthew L June 12, 2016 at 1:20 pm Their husbands? Mark Wadsworth June 12, 2016 at 1:26 pm That’s almost a nice bit of pedantry but the gist of the headline perfectly clear. DocBud June 12, 2016 at 4:41 pm Islam. Mr Ecks June 12, 2016 at 5:16 pm A car? Interested June 12, 2016 at 6:33 pm I don’t know how they get there it how the guy who just shot 50 gays dead in Florida but I do know that utter cunts like Ironman and SJW Paul think it’s ‘racist’ to ask, or even notice what’s going on. John square June 12, 2016 at 7:04 pm Be interesting to see Trump’s response to Orlando. Suspect it’ll give him a 5 point boost, and endear him to the pro gun lobby when he says that most of those people would be alive had there been more guns in the club*. *notice the gunman didn’t go to a rap concert. Mr Ecks June 12, 2016 at 7:11 pm Indeed. 50 well-armed people will easily kill one idiot who is shooting at them before he can get off more than a few shots. Of course much better to wait for the state’s costumed thugs to arrive. They have top skills at drawing chalk outlines around bodies. So much practice you see. The marvels of statism, socialism, welfarism , drug wars etc have provided them with huge amounts of practice. Better live in a world in which the state’s thugs have all the guns. Until the state gets taken over by gay haters and they all get rounded up and killed. PJF June 12, 2016 at 7:30 pm Trump should come straight out and say this is why he wants to suspend Muslim immigration to the US. Every non-Muslim country should suspend immigration of Muslims. The core religion / culture is debased and insane. Not worth the risk. Fuck ’em, and fuck the Ironman/SJW they rode in on. Philip Scott Thomas June 12, 2016 at 7:33 pm @Mark Wadsworth How many years have you been hanging round this blog? How do you not by now know: 1) the general use of ‘pendantry’ in these parts, and 2) Timmy’s sense of humour? It’s the back to the classroom for you. Bloke in Costa Rica June 12, 2016 at 7:44 pm Some fraction north of 90% of Moslem colonists think shariah should be the law everywhere. This should be an absolutely disqualifying condition for entry to any Western society. No ifs, not buts. I don’t care if the governments in their countries are spraying sarin on them from cropdusters. I mean I literally, thoroughly don’t give a fuck. You think shariah overrules our system of laws and you can die in your shitholes. Gamecock June 12, 2016 at 8:22 pm ‘This should be an absolutely disqualifying condition for entry to any Western society.’ Well said. BWTM: And each one carries a book that says they should kill us. It’s not rocket surgery. Decadent dicks in charge of the West are nice to people who are under orders to kill them. How stupid can you get? Muslim shoots up a gay bar. Well, why wouldn’t he? Flubber June 12, 2016 at 8:31 pm https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qBlwxqqAprQ Listen to the reverends measly mouth platitudes. Good job shepherd. jgh June 12, 2016 at 9:18 pm But the Orlando gunman wasn’t an immigrant, he was born in the US. A steel wall around the states wouldn’t have stopped him. Bloke in Costa Rica June 12, 2016 at 9:48 pm It would have stopped his fucking father, an Afghan immigrant, who said his son got angry at the sight of two blokes kissing, but then that shooting 50 people dead in a gay nightclub had nothing to do with religion. Gamecock June 12, 2016 at 9:59 pm ‘But the Orlando gunman wasn’t an immigrant, he was born in the US. A steel wall around the states wouldn’t have stopped him.’ And your point is . . . ? Gamecock June 12, 2016 at 10:05 pm http://www.breitbart.com/news/early-reports-orlando-shooter-homophobe-wife-beater/ Uhhh . . . yeah, he was a Muslim. PJF June 12, 2016 at 10:12 pm Teh gayerz are now learning their place in the leftard pecking order of approved victim groups, by becoming victims of the top group. Further denial will be the final solution. Bloke in Costa Rica June 12, 2016 at 10:23 pm Now it turns out that Daddy dearest had a hard-on for the Taliban. The phrase ‘moderate Moslem’ has about as much connection to reality as ‘moderate Aztec’. john77 June 12, 2016 at 10:37 pm @ BiCR Have you been watching too much “Doctor Who”? A wall built by President Trump would prevent an Afghan refugee arriving over 30 years ago? PJF June 12, 2016 at 10:56 pm @john77 I suppose this is a thread for pedantry. And that’s all you’ve got. Mr Ecks June 12, 2016 at 10:57 pm John 77:Had a wall existed –steel or otherwise, even a legalpaper wall–the father would not have got in and thus the son would be goat-herding in Afganhni and not murdering over here. But you know that of course. It seems he may have been a G4S employee, a security guard and fully licensed to carry a gun. No wonder the usual media squark has been toned WAY down. PJF–Correct. The anti-white “anti-racists” are top of the CM shitheap with femmi-scum and gayers + at No 2. Hence the femmi bitches are either silent about RoPrape and/or try to cast doubt on the testimony of female victims of events that took place only days before. While insisting that tall tales of sex abuse by white men from 50 years ago with zero corroboration MUST be believed. Eco-freaks are a poor third. Bloke in Costa Rica June 12, 2016 at 11:41 pm No, john77. You’re normally more sensible than that. If you want pendantry, I use modal auxiliary ‘should’ in ‘should be’ to encompass the pluperfect ‘should have been’. john77 June 13, 2016 at 12:05 am Legal walls keep out law-abiding would-be citizens, just as gun-control laws prevent law-abiding citizens buying guns. But if you want to build a wall that is really effective at stopping illegals, you are Uncle Joe or Erich Honecker. Trump just isn’t that competent, let alone expert, a player at the “evil overlord” game. JerryC June 13, 2016 at 12:47 am According to my Facebook feed, this is all because Right Wing Christians tried to pass legislation keeping trannies out of women’s bathrooms. Or something. JerryC June 13, 2016 at 12:50 am “But if you want to build a wall that is really effective at stopping illegals, you are Uncle Joe or Erich Honecker.” Um..the Berlin Wall was designed to keep people in, not to keep people out. Locking your doors at night is not morally equivalent to keeping that hitchiker locked up in your basement. Bloke in Costa Rica June 13, 2016 at 1:25 am In addition to bringing back the preview, the ability to +1 a comment would be nice… bloke in france June 13, 2016 at 2:57 am In other news, the number of conversions to Christianity is up. Given that 100% of them, it seems, are Iranian, and given that their rape manual allows any amount of lying and subterfuge, one wonders how genuine these conversions are. The C of E says it’s no different to having your child baptised in order to get him in a good school. Hmmm. Oh well, for every sinner that repenteth, and so on. bloke in france June 13, 2016 at 2:59 am Sorry, the rape manual encourages, not just allows. Preview, Tim? So Much For Subtlety June 13, 2016 at 3:32 am PJF – “Teh gayerz are now learning their place in the leftard pecking order of approved victim groups, by becoming victims of the top group. Further denial will be the final solution.” Obama’s speech was a great example of the pecking order at work. He said they are trying to determine if it was a Hate Crime – as if gunning down White heterosexuals is so much better than gunning down some racially mixed homosexuals. Which, to be fair, is probably close to what a lot of the Left believes. He didn’t seem to come out and call it a terror attack to me – he said the FBI was assuming it was. And he did not call it an Islamist, much less a Muslim, attack. That hierarchy of value is still clearly there and White, male, heterosexuals are clearly close to the bottom of that pile. A wall is not enough. We also need mass expulsions. All immigration since Windrush ought to be undone. So Much For Subtlety June 13, 2016 at 3:40 am Ted Cruz may be a weasel, but he knows what to say: It is a time for action. We need a Commander in Chief who will speak the truth, and who will unleash the full force and fury of the American military to utterly destroy ISIS and its affiliates. We need to pass the Expatriate Terrorist Act, so that known ISIS terrorists cannot use U.S. passports to return to America and wage jihad. We need a President who is serious – who will identify the enemy by name and do everything necessary to defeat it. The next few days will be sadly predictable. Democrats will try to use this attack to change the subject. As a matter of rigid ideology, far too many Democrats – from Barack Obama to Hillary Clinton – will refuse to utter the words ‘radical Islamic terrorism.’ They will claim this attack, like they claimed every previous attack, was isolated and had nothing to do with the vicious Islamist theology that is daily waging war on us across the globe. And they will try to exploit this terror attack to undermine the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms of law-abiding Americans. Enough is enough. What we need is for every American – Democrat and Republican – to come together, abandon political correctness, and unite in defeating radical Islamic terrorism. ISIS doesn’t just target soldiers. They don’t just target Republicans. Or Jews. They also target Christians and fellow Muslims. They target each and every one of us. As we saw this morning, they target the gay and lesbian community. Their objective, which they broadcast worldwide, is to murder or forcibly convert every single American. For all the Democrats who are loud champions of the gay and lesbian community whenever there is a culture battle waging, now is the opportunity to speak out against an ideology that calls for the murder of gays and lesbians. ISIS and the theocracy in Iran (supported with American taxpayer dollars) regularly murder homosexuals, throwing them from buildings and burying them under rocks. This is wrong, it is evil, and we must all stand against it. Every human being has a right to live according to his or her faith and conscience, and nobody has a right to murder someone who doesn’t share their faith or sexual orientation. If you’re a Democratic politician and you really want to stand for LGBT, show real courage and stand up against the vicious ideology that has targeted our fellow Americans for murder. Trump is not bad either. Last night, our nation was attacked by a radical Islamic terrorist. It was the worst terrorist attack on our soil since 9/11, and the second of its kind in 6 months. My deepest sympathy and support goes out to the victims, the wounded, and their families. In his remarks today, President Obama disgracefully refused to even say the words ‘Radical Islam’. For that reason alone, he should step down. If Hillary Clinton, after this attack, still cannot say the two words ‘Radical Islam’ she should get out of this race for the Presidency. If we do not get tough and smart real fast, we are not going to have a country anymore. Because our leaders are weak, I said this was going to happen — and it is only going to get worse. I am trying to save lives and prevent the next terrorist attack. We can’t afford to be politically correct anymore. The terrorist, Omar Mir Saddique Mateen, is the son of an immigrant from Afghanistan who openly published his support for the Afghanistani Taliban and even tried to run for President of Afghanistan. According to Pew, 99% of people in Afghanistan support oppressive Sharia Law. We admit more than 100,000 lifetime migrants from the Middle East each year. Since 9/11, hundreds of migrants and their children have been implicated in terrorism in the United States. Hillary Clinton wants to dramatically increase admissions from the Middle East, bringing in many hundreds of thousands during a first term — and we will have no way to screen them, pay for them, or prevent the second generation from radicalizing. We need to protect all Americans, of all backgrounds and all beliefs, from Radical Islamic Terrorism – which has no place in an open and tolerant society. Radical Islam advocates hate for women, gays, Jews, Christians and all Americans. I am going to be a President for all Americans, and I am going to protect and defend all Americans. We are going to make America safe again and great again for everyone. Two of the Left’s favourite constituencies are intent on murdering each other. That puts them in a tough position. No wonder the Left likes to blame colonialism or the Jews. David Moore June 13, 2016 at 4:21 am “Two of the Left’s favourite constituencies are intent on murdering each other. That puts them in a tough position. No wonder the Left likes to blame colonialism or the Jews.” It doesn’t seem that tough for them at all, the left are immune to cognitive dissonance. No doubt as to the outcome though, When the shameless fight the spineless, its the shameless who win. Surreptitious Evil June 13, 2016 at 6:45 am I honestly haven’t seen vigilante lesbian gangs attacking mosques? The murdering all appears to be one sided. JuliaM June 13, 2016 at 6:51 am I note that this morning’s ‘Guardian’ headline knows where to place the blame: the Second Amendment. Well, obvs, innit? Gamecock June 13, 2016 at 11:38 am Some Americana for you: Most states ban the carrying of concealed weapons in places that serve alcohol for consumption. Even if you have a license to carry, as I do, you can’t legally carry in any bar, gay or not. As Muslim terrorism escalates in the U.S., the culture will become subject to review. People with guns drinking may not be as bad as Muslims killing people who drink. A century of decadence may come to an end. Being unarmed and depending on government to keep you safe may be over. john77 June 13, 2016 at 8:12 pm @ SE Please record a video when you do see one. It would be fascinating to watch. john77 June 13, 2016 at 9:43 pm @ Jerry C I didn’t say which way the wall works – the one to keep people out is a perfect mirror-image of the one to keep people in. JerryC June 13, 2016 at 10:13 pm “…the one to keep people out is a perfect mirror-image of the one to keep people in.” The logical implication of this comment is that borders are immoral, you know. Is that what you are arguing for? So Much For Subtlety June 13, 2016 at 11:31 pm john77 – “I didn’t say which way the wall works – the one to keep people out is a perfect mirror-image of the one to keep people in.” Well no. How can you make that claim? A wall that is built to keep people out has nothing whatsoever in common with a wall built to keep people in. Leave a Reply Cancel replyYour email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment Name * Email * Website Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.