Mr. Redacto? Report for your beating pleaseJuly 23, 2016 Tim WorstallNewspaper Watch6 CommentsHillary’s choice or running-mate upsets the left Sigh. previousOf course, you must pay the tax before you appeal the bill…..nextScott Adams might be right you know 6 thoughts on “Mr. Redacto? Report for your beating please” Chris July 23, 2016 at 10:49 am On the other hand, ‘Ritchie then political analyst’ apparently doesn’t require either correction or for Tim to beat himself. Tim Worstall July 23, 2016 at 10:55 am Quite so, I am not paid large sums by Mr. Murdoch to proof read things. Mr. Redacto is…… John Price July 23, 2016 at 11:53 am Redacto here. Ouchy. We’ve all done that one, unfortunately. Glad to see, Tim, that you have moved to a better class of newspaper. Chris July 23, 2016 at 12:00 pm So you maximise your utility by minimising your accuracy. Bit like Ritchie, really. Surreptitious Evil July 23, 2016 at 3:16 pm So you maximise your utility by minimising your accuracy. Tim seems to do it by not spending time correcting trivial mistakes on this blog (he will correct or at least acknowledge errors on Forbes) – a very different thing than getting your premises, axioms and deductions wrong, a le LHTD. Interested July 23, 2016 at 4:44 pm I once saw (local paper) a tv review iof a journey through China which contained the following: ‘The programme, which was conveniently divided up into bite size chinks, …’ You’d wonder how this happens, but then pilots crash aircraft. Leave a Reply Cancel replyYour email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment Name * Email * Website Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.