ASwedish police investigator reportedly dropped a sexual assault charge because the two alleged victims had “gigantic breasts”.
Two women reported a professional ice hockey player to police after he allegedly grabbed their breasts at the Marité nightclub in Ostersund, northern Sweden.
But on Tuesday the lead investigator Mikael Lundberg reportedly said there was no proof the player had assaulted the women, or that the man had touched them intentionally.
“It’s pertinent in this case that the women had gigantic breasts,” he told reporters from Expressen newspaper.
“It wasn’t hard to brush up against them. If you’re drunk and draping yourself over someone, well, you can see how it might have happened.”
Swedish broadcaster SVT also reported that Mr Lundberg had told them that one of the girls had “very large breasts and it was hard not to brush against them.”
Sorta, am I brushing them, or are they brushing up against me?
Perhaps he should counter-sue for assault?
And this is from the repeated touted feminist utopia (well, until the invasion of the rapey hordes from we-all-know-where)?
This should provide Julian Assange with food for thought.
Just good enough to cause reasonable doubt in the mind of the of the judge/jury
I’m not sure I can comment until I’ve seen pictures.
Sounds like the officer realised that the prosecution would go tits up.
Next it’ll be the “but I had a ginormous erection” defence.
I think we would really need photographic evidence of the items in question, to be able to judge the validity of the decision.
As someone said to me yesterday, tits are proof positive that men can multi-task.