Fourth Law of Social Dynamics: any outfit with “justice” in its title is devoted to injustice.
dearieme
Maybe the Fourth Law should be more abstract so that it also covers cases such as Social Housing hosting a disproportionately high proportion of anti-social people.
dearieme
Am I implying that “social justice” will prove to mean anti-social injustice? So it would seem.
So SJW => anti-social unjust wimp.
john77
@ dearieme
With all due respect, I disagree. “any” should be “most”. Since the cover-up story would not work if there was not/had not been a genuine organisation seeking justice with “justice” in its title.
Your second post could be misread, so to clarify – a small proportion of social housing tenants are anti-social but a majority of anti-social individuals live in “social housing”.
Arthur Teacake
@dearieme:
It’d be clearer to say ‘devoted to promoting injustice’.
Wouldn’t want to accidentally reinforce the idea that they work against injustice.
Fourth Law of Social Dynamics: any outfit with “justice” in its title is devoted to injustice.
Maybe the Fourth Law should be more abstract so that it also covers cases such as Social Housing hosting a disproportionately high proportion of anti-social people.
Am I implying that “social justice” will prove to mean anti-social injustice? So it would seem.
So SJW => anti-social unjust wimp.
@ dearieme
With all due respect, I disagree. “any” should be “most”. Since the cover-up story would not work if there was not/had not been a genuine organisation seeking justice with “justice” in its title.
Your second post could be misread, so to clarify – a small proportion of social housing tenants are anti-social but a majority of anti-social individuals live in “social housing”.
@dearieme:
It’d be clearer to say ‘devoted to promoting injustice’.
Wouldn’t want to accidentally reinforce the idea that they work against injustice.