It’s all about sex, isn’t it?

Volunteers in the Calais Jungle have been accused of sexually exploiting refugees and even child migrants.

The Independent has discovered a serious row has broken out among some unpaid charity workers at the camp in northern France, with some believing forging sexual relationships with adult refugees is natural in such circumstances, while others say it breaches all usual codes of conduct.

No, not quite.

The man added that the majority of cases in question involved female volunteers and male refugees – which he claimed risked the objectification of women volunteering in the camp.

Seems a long way to go for a bit of rough but then perhaps we’ve just not got any left at home?

46 thoughts on “It’s all about sex, isn’t it?”

  1. So Much For Subtlety

    50 Shades of Grey is a best seller for a reason.

    Western men are simply too spineless and effeminate. There is probably a reason Merkel wants to import so many.

  2. SMFS, I can’t say I’ve ever considered most of the refugees who you typically see inhabit the jungle as being particularly manly or well spine’ed, but I guess the bar isn’t that high.

  3. More detail is required. Are these 18 year old female volunteers or 40 year old female volunteers? I’m guessing the latter, but you never know.

  4. So Much For Subtlety

    David Moore – “I can’t say I’ve ever considered most of the refugees who you typically see inhabit the jungle as being particularly manly or well spine’ed, but I guess the bar isn’t that high.”

    Brad Pitt is about to get divorced and like the sap he is, he will co-operate with the process. Make it easy for her. He won’t beat her to death or cut her throat in the street.

    I guess definitions of manly differ.

    Those female volunteers get in trouble in those camps partly because they are cruising for a bit of rough but mainly because Western men are so spineless that they do not respond to obvious provocation. Third World Muslims are slightly less restrained. So they want a bit of trouble but then get more than they can handle.

    It is a sign of a dying culture when the women desert it for other men.

  5. “I’ve fucked up the HTML again.”

    It looked like one of those immense Daily Mail hyperlinks.

    Anyway, will the BBC declare these conflicts of interest the next time they allow women from these groups free airtime to espouse why their new found paramours deserve a golden ticket to Britain?

  6. Lots of women who work with refugees/migrants seem to end up married to one, or at least shacked up. (Anecdotal, but…)

    I imagine more men who work with migrants would too, if there were more female migrants advisable (esp ones not already married – few women travel alone, too risky for obvious reasons, people smugglers and single young male travel companions).

    But I’m not sure it’s all about the “bit of rough”, in many cases one could say kindly that they are just big-hearted people who care very much, or unkindly one could say “messiah complex”.

  7. From the quote: “which he claimed risked the objectification of women volunteering in the camp.”

    Who have already objectified the men in the camp.

  8. Is it like those loony women who write to murderers in prison and end up marrying them? Maybe we suffer from a murderer shortage.

  9. No, we’ve got plenty of rough left at home

    We do, but the middle classes won’t mix with the lower class “rough” set. Unless they are foreign, in which case it is no problem. The same applies for men too, BTW.

  10. It looked like one of those immense Daily Mail hyperlinks.

    Hey, don’t knock them: you can hover over the hyperlink and save yourself the bother of opening the page. 😀

  11. Seems a long way to go for a bit of rough

    Even in the world of rough there are limits though not for these “fun” seekers, never mind the stench and desease that comes free, this is taking the “look at me” generation to a whole new level.

  12. Our very own jungle in Great Yarmouth Norfolk seems to be able to cope with a massive numbers of immigrants and tourists shagging each other.

    Lets face facts the Pirate pitch and putt or the Model Village isnt the draw for endless coach holidays full of old ladies is it.

    Its a great place for a quick shag for the ladies and a little bit of an earner for the lads at the hand car wash near Sainsburys.

  13. Tim Newman

    That photo. You are so right and milkboy knows it: look at his crossed legs, arm brace posture. He’s trying to cover up the loss of his manhood.

    On the other hand, I can’t blame Mr Hunky Arab if and when he does give the blonde what she so clearly wants: she is not unattractive.

  14. Recusant – depends on what he prefers. The husband could be the one ends up in bed…
    Saying that the most persistant romeos the wife had to deal with when working at Amtrack was the arabs and the Iranians. She probably got as much attention from them as most of the rest of the women put together. There was one quite dishy male, sadly he preferred blondes and I’m not blonde.

  15. Tim N

    We do, but the middle classes won’t mix with the lower class “rough” set. Unless they are foreign, in which case it is no problem. The same applies for men too, BTW.

    I’m married to a foreign girl from a poor family but she and generally in my experience others are not ‘rough’. She is totally devoted to our daughter, can cook a plethora of meals from raw ingredients, wants to better herself, to work, keeps a spotless home. Totally different from these underclass fucks in England or God forbid some rapey cunt in the Calais ‘Jungle’. She’s a better mindset than half the middle class English I grew up with. IMO completely different to some SJW wanting to get banged by some aforementioned bit of rough in Calais.

  16. I’m married to a foreign girl from a poor family but she and generally in my experience others are not ‘rough’.

    Oh, I’m not equating rough with poor. There are plenty of decent poor people in any part of the world. But the Philippines produce women from an underclass who westerners would do well to stay well clear of, but usually don’t. And the decent local folk don’t give them the time of day. You see it in every country.

  17. One thing I will say about certain large French oil companies: they haven’t adopted the pathetic, nannying Internet blocking practices beloved of AngloSaxon companies.

  18. According to my wife, who has counseled some women, the men don’t go in for foreplay and their men all ejaculate prematurely.

    Maybe it’s a German thing, memories of the Red Army.

  19. Dongguan John – “I’m married to a foreign girl from a poor family but she and generally in my experience others are not ‘rough’.”

    I don’t think you have understood the context of “rough” here correctly. Upper Middle Class Gays, and to a lesser extent women, used to cruise for working class men because they liked a bit of rough handling.

    The transgression is in that inversion of the normal moral order. A poor girl marrying a rich First World man is normal. Girls want to marry up. So cruising for a Third World refugee is unusual. Presumably part of the thrill is that he might just kill you. And some times he does:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gale_Benson

  20. Reminds me of that girl who had a documentary about an ‘acid in the face attack’ in the UK a few years ago, attractive middle class girl going out with a completely obvious thug, hardly a surprising outcome. Yet in the entire docco, not a soul mentioned the rather obvious point……

  21. I know aidworkers: the romantic specs w which they view the third world are positively Rousseauesque. Getting down and dirty with a randy migrant proves their bona fides that they are not racist and reject eurocentrism. Of course any heterosexual male worker would find his genitals in his mouth and abroom somewhere uncomfortable should he show similar interest in female refugees, hence predominance of women workers.

  22. A poor girl marrying a rich First World man is normal.

    Yes, but have a read of the porno-books which women love to read (and you never hear about feminists wanting to ban): they are all full of some high class woman going down to the woods or stables and being fucked senseless by some ruffian of the lower orders, with lots of adjectives such as “forced” and “helpless” and “powerless” thrown in. Women fantasise about this stuff, which is fair enough; a few are stupid enough to try it for real.

  23. A cynic would say that it’s a simply an animal display of fitness: if you are not strong enough to overpower me, you aren’t strong enough to protect me.

    This is completely bollixed up by the woe[2all]mens insisting the state protect them. Now no man can overcome their protector, the state, so no man is eligible. Except for the scum who couldn’t give two fingers for the state. And anyway BOOM! Hahaha!

  24. Tim N at 0836

    You’ve just summarised DH Lawrence’s novel.

    Personally I think Lady Chatterly made a mistake as Mellors was such a frightful prig and a bore.

  25. Tim Newman – “Yes, but have a read of the porno-books which women love to read (and you never hear about feminists wanting to ban): they are all full of some high class woman going down to the woods or stables and being fucked senseless by some ruffian of the lower orders”

    Are they? The only one I can think of is written by a man – Lady Chatterley’s Lover. The model for all such books is Pride and Prejudice. Darcy owns a mansion. If you look at Georgette Heyer, the typical plot runs:

    The story follows Lord Jack Carstares, an English nobleman who becomes a highwayman after taking the blame during a cheating scandal years before. One day, he rescues Miss Diana Beauleigh when she is almost abducted by the Duke of Andover. Jack and Diana fall in love but his troubled past and current profession threaten their happiness.

    That is he may be a thug, but he is a Lord as well. The secret nobleman who has been slumming it has been pointed out in an American context here as well:

    https://dalrock.wordpress.com/2011/02/24/single-in-the-suburbs-how-match-com-sells-your-wife-post-marital-spinsterhood/

    “with lots of adjectives such as “forced” and “helpless” and “powerless” thrown in. Women fantasise about this stuff, which is fair enough; a few are stupid enough to try it for real.”

    50 Shades shows how popular it is. Are they that dumb? More and more of them are.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *