The intelligence of the Guardian reading classesJanuary 3, 2017 Tim WorstallPolitics16 Comments From, via Matt Wardman previousIs this not actually the point?nextThis is what happens when the anal retentives gain power 16 thoughts on “The intelligence of the Guardian reading classes” JuliaM January 3, 2017 at 9:04 am LOL!!!! Harry Powell January 3, 2017 at 9:09 am Whenever I need cheering up I spend five minutes reading this prize booby’s comments https://profile.theguardian.com/user/id/4553669?page=1 . bilbaoboy January 3, 2017 at 9:10 am Oh Julia, don’t be so cruel! Triple 750 is obviously lysdexic bilbaoboy January 3, 2017 at 9:14 am Harry Truly good fun, but he must be a troll, surely? Harry Powell January 3, 2017 at 9:17 am If he is then he’s a genius. JuliaM January 3, 2017 at 9:25 am Having read the CiF article on trainers, I’m no longer sure the ‘Guardian’ isn’t just trolling us all in 2017… Matt W January 3, 2017 at 9:28 am If the one is a troll, then the other one is the stupid one for falling for it 🙂 Jason Lynch January 3, 2017 at 10:21 am Harry, Sadly, TheLastClassWarrior’s comments are currently being “pre-moderated”. I’m going to call it a combination of malicious trolling and a test of Poe’s Law… DP January 3, 2017 at 10:27 am Dear Mr Worstall Jesus Christ is an MP? DP So Much For Subtlety January 3, 2017 at 10:40 am Speaking of cruel: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4082820/Corbyn-lost-44-Labour-voters-2015-Party-lose-90-seats-election-four-million-people-desert-just-18-months.html Now if only we had a conservative party to vote for. Nemo January 3, 2017 at 12:25 pm Bilbaoboy and Harry Powell: why must ‘he’ be a ‘he’ at all? If you imagine those posts being written by a late 20s/early 30s female lecturer with a PhD in Idiot Studies, don’t they seem more scarily believable? Andrew M January 3, 2017 at 12:50 pm TheLastClassWarrior must be a troll. He name-checks our favourite accountant: Professor Richard Murphy is probably the world’s greatest expert on tax economics, and his analysis has never been proved wrong. Then again, most people would struggle to write this stuff with a straight face consistently for four years. Poe’s law is strong with this one. Lionel Ebb January 3, 2017 at 5:36 pm Splendid! But he might not be either quite soon, apparently: http://bit.ly/2hOwrlf BlokeInTejas January 3, 2017 at 8:36 pm JC for Military Policeman…??? Boggles quietly… So Much For Subtlety January 4, 2017 at 12:29 am BlokeInTejas – “JC for Military Policeman…???” Joan Collins in uniform?!!! (Well, when she was younger…..) john77 January 5, 2017 at 9:36 pm @ Andrew M I proved his analysis of my tax situation wrong years ago (long before he banned me) Leave a Reply Cancel replyYour email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment Name * Email * Website Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.