This is a good question, isn’t it?May 24, 2017 Tim WorstallCurrent Affairs9 CommentsSo, Michelle, just when did it become unacceptable to bomb Manchester? Asked of the Sinn Fein leader in Ulster. previousBastards! How dare they apologies for saying this?nextSnippa Spuddas all over accounting standards 9 thoughts on “This is a good question, isn’t it?” wat dabney May 24, 2017 at 9:16 am This seems like a simple case of racism on her part. BraveFart May 24, 2017 at 9:37 am A different but similar question could also be asked of the bearded traitor JC. So Much For Subtlety May 24, 2017 at 11:15 am A complaint to the Race Relations people and the Press Council will surely follow. After all, *we* are the enemy here. Not the bombers. bloke in france May 24, 2017 at 1:58 pm Or blame it on the militant wings: The earthquakers The rhythm Methodists High church Cof E The Pedant-General May 24, 2017 at 5:24 pm That’s an astonishing and brilliant leader. Haven’t seen that kind of moral clarity for quite some time. Ironman May 24, 2017 at 6:48 pm Corbyn is a traitor and the election now SHOULD be about nothing else. Martin May 24, 2017 at 9:49 pm If he’s a traitor then try him. In a court as is usual with traitors. Unless he isn’t a traitor, just an idiot with principles? john77 May 24, 2017 at 11:58 pm @ Martin They haven’t tried Gerry Adams or Martin McGuiness yet: unlike Lord Haw-haw or Sir Roger Casement. Treason is a common law offence so it would require mens rea and I doubt that Jeremy Coprbyn is capable of that since he believes that he is always right. John Square May 25, 2017 at 6:40 am @The Pendant-General Quite. The closing section on Labour was fantastic Leave a Reply Cancel replyYour email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment Name * Email * Website Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.