Anyone want to pick the sexually gratifying content out of this?

From Google.

Ads suspended on this page because of porno images, videos, games, sexually gratifying text, a page the rives traffic to such content.

This page here.

If Straights Can’t Play Gays, Does That Mean Gays Can’t Play Straights?

Something odd is going on over in the world of make believe. There’s seems to be considerable confusion over what acting is all about – pretending. That being the job of an actor, to pretend. There are very few Danish princes treading the boards but someone has to play Hamlet. Oddly enough those shot, blown up and stabbed on screen don’t in fact die, they get up again and still do panto at Christmas. Not all the people playing the good guys really do rescue kittens as a hobby even though it is of course true that all the bad guys really do eat babies for breakfast.

I assume it’s someone whining about the point being made rather than the page itself.

Sigh.

14 thoughts on “Anyone want to pick the sexually gratifying content out of this?”

  1. Surreptitious Evil

    With the near-infinite variety of human perversity, almost anything might be considered “sexually gratifying” if you posit a sufficiently deviant soul.

    But, yes …

  2. I’ve been trying to trigger Farceberk’s boobs’n’willie filter by posting images of Nymphs In The Lake, The Sabine Women, Echo And Narcissis, Defence of Thermopolia, etc., still haven’t triggered it. I’ll have to try pantomime dames.

  3. I suspect Google thinks that the page is referring to the exotic – and, occasionally vigorous – content of the ‘gay for pay’ variety. A-la Dink Flamingo.

  4. Today’s rib-tickler:

    Muslim Male Inmate Objects to Strip Search by Apparently Anatomically Female Transgender Guard

  5. dearieme,

    And of course the appropriate American legal rule is the complainant’s personal understanding or belief in the requirements of the religion. You are not permitted to get a scholar, priest or other religious authority to tell the court that the believer is barking and, of course, the religion requires no such thing. You have to go with their interpretation.

    Which makes some RLUIPA cases quite so snigger worthy from this side of the pond.

  6. jgh, sorry, cousin Agostino Caracci was the one who did the ever-so-educational illustrations of greek myths and such I meant to refer to. Annibale was the respectable one.

  7. “And of course the appropriate American legal rule is the complainant’s personal understanding or belief in the requirements of the religion.”
    Not quite. The rule is that no USA court can decide which religious beliefs are valid and which are not. This often comes up in property disputes between a break-away congregation and the orthodox denomination which proclaims it represents the ‘true faith’.

  8. I’m sorry, but Rose cannot self-identify as both Lesbian and Gender Fluid, she just can’t. I’ve tried drawing the VENN DIAGRAM FOR OUR TIMES of it, but it just doesn’t work.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *