Pendantry I know, but weren’t they and George Blake ( Georg Behar), who was busted out of prison by CND members, MI6 rather than MI5.
Tim Worstall
Indeed so which is why “spies” not “MI5”
Gamecock
So the employers are LGBT?
Paul Rowntree
Homosexualiists? Many, perhaps. Not, however, the gender-spazzed…
The day we entrust our national security to the gender-spazzed is the day we are finished. No-one so self-absorbed, confused and mental should have any role in national security. End of.
Bloke no Longer in Austria
There’ s a bit in the film The Guard, where Brendan Gleeson’s copper is going through the arsenal of an ex-IRA man, finds a tiny pistol and asks what it is good for.
“Yer keep it in yer underpants.”
“Why ?”
“It came in handy when dealing with the MI5 lads..”
…It is the same with reports about Sir James Dyson moving his company HQ to Singapore. It transpires that it will mean only two executives relocating from the UK – the company will continue to employ 3000 workers at its research and development centre in Wiltshire…
Up to a point. In earlier times when “being so” was illegal, those who “were so” ran the risk of being blackmailed and were thus a security risk. That was what did for Turing. Official position was to discriminate against gays, but that obviously didn’t stop Burgess or Maclean.
Jason Lynch
One issue with the Cambridge gang is that they all were whoopsies… at a point where it was outright illegal. Hence, major vulnerability to compromise and blackmail, with well-reported results.
Why go making it easy for FIS to target your staff?
The Meissen Bison
Alex: Official position was to discriminate against gays…
Or ‘pansies’ as they were called in those days.
Edward Lud
Or pooves. Or queers.
Or, as Dennis Wheatley, Lord love him, describing a rent boy, put it, “one of the most repellent young men Richard had ever set eyes on”.
Pendantry I know, but weren’t they and George Blake ( Georg Behar), who was busted out of prison by CND members, MI6 rather than MI5.
Indeed so which is why “spies” not “MI5”
So the employers are LGBT?
Homosexualiists? Many, perhaps. Not, however, the gender-spazzed…
The day we entrust our national security to the gender-spazzed is the day we are finished. No-one so self-absorbed, confused and mental should have any role in national security. End of.
There’ s a bit in the film The Guard, where Brendan Gleeson’s copper is going through the arsenal of an ex-IRA man, finds a tiny pistol and asks what it is good for.
“Yer keep it in yer underpants.”
“Why ?”
“It came in handy when dealing with the MI5 lads..”
Is Dyson’s Singapore move anything to do with Brexit?
Dyson to move headquarters to Singapore but says it’s ‘nothing to do with Brexit’
“The spies have always been so, haven’t they?”
Up to a point. In earlier times when “being so” was illegal, those who “were so” ran the risk of being blackmailed and were thus a security risk. That was what did for Turing. Official position was to discriminate against gays, but that obviously didn’t stop Burgess or Maclean.
One issue with the Cambridge gang is that they all were whoopsies… at a point where it was outright illegal. Hence, major vulnerability to compromise and blackmail, with well-reported results.
Why go making it easy for FIS to target your staff?
Alex: Official position was to discriminate against gays…
Or ‘pansies’ as they were called in those days.
Or pooves. Or queers.
Or, as Dennis Wheatley, Lord love him, describing a rent boy, put it, “one of the most repellent young men Richard had ever set eyes on”.
Or as perverts. Also Dennis Wheatley.
Horse’s hoof.
(Not to be confused with camel toe.)