Two reasons why she got the part

20 thoughts on “Two reasons why she got the part”

  1. She’s Uma Thurman’s daughter, looks like her, and Tarantino is kinda obsessed with Uma Thurman (NTTAWT).

  2. So we can look forward to her flashing her pair on a big screen? Who says they are not serious about making money when they make movies, and it all is in interest of art?

  3. As someone once said said about Amanda Holden, “If you have little talent, show ’em your tits.”.
    Whether that saying originated in, or moved across
    to, the USA is not not known.

  4. So Maya…. About this tape you made in your bedroom with your dad…. Any chance…. Er,,,, No. Of course…. Right.

  5. You know, I’m trying to look at her face really I am but I keep on seeing her golden globes. Well played, well played

  6. I don’t get it. IIRC (from dangerous liasons) Uma, at Mayas age was busty but niether Uma’s career nor Quentin’s were founded on or exploited that feature (again IIRC). But Maya, though looking very much like mum above the shoulders, judging from that red carpet pic didn’t get the full maternal endowment.

  7. Someone on the Twitter thread is attacking people for “sexualizing” her!
    I think that maybe Ms Thurman Jnr and her choice of outfit is doing 99.999% of the sexualizing here.

  8. I don’t get it. IIRC (from dangerous liasons) Uma, at Mayas age was busty but niether Uma’s career nor Quentin’s were founded on or exploited that feature (again IIRC).

    One is perhaps forgetting Uma Thurman’s performance with John Gavin Malkovich in Stephen Frears adaptation of Dangerous Liaisons (1988)?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *