Politics Site

If it is another “comments neutered” special Tim don’t bother. Guido already does enough censoring for 10 new sites.

HangTheBastards.com

ToTheTower.com

I would imagine what Tim means is they don’t turn up on Google searches because “unsuitable content”. Or flagged as hotbeds of a Waffen SS revival movement.
Which is where your political site’ll end up if you’re not woke enough.
I’d imagine Google’d like to blacklist Guido. But he got in under the wire. He’s got too big a readership now.

They-work-for-you-and-if-you-believe-that-youre-a-sad-dupe.com

Disorder-disorder.com

headsonpikes.com

It’s a crowded field, what’s your USP? Your URL should probably reflect it.

“Politics Site
September 7, 2019 By Richard”

Who is Richard?

How about, The Dark Web?

dennisthepeasant.com is available.

M’Lud: Bit light in the loafers, perhaps

– there’s bundles of them in parliament and loads more aspiring to get in.

Wot BIND and TMB said.

If you keep doing what you’re doing, then presumably you’re going to keep getting the same result – my understanding is that the big Macedonian boys who are in roughly the same line of business as you, albeit fakenewsier, just play “whack-a-mole” (as the moles, rather than the hammer) and keep popping up again under new names until Google catches them once more.

But that’s a self-limiting business model, when to make a really good living you probably want to be developing a site that has the chance to really mature and establish itself. Which presumably means finding a USP, concentrating intently on that, and not doing whatever the thing is that Google doesn’t want you to do.

Failing that, I can’t see how having your own site can bring in more than freelancing – the pay rates for freelancing might not be brilliant but at least they’re being backed by a good number more eyeballs than a typical one-man-band site can muster.

welleckscuseme.uk

Inthenameofgodgo.org

reichstag.gov.eu

I repeat previous comments, what exactly is Google “censoring”? I’ve just done a search for “Tim Worstall” and the first hit was here. But that’s to be expected. What searches are you assuming people are doing which results in this site not being listed?

If I did a search for “pet fish” I wouldn’t expect this site to be listed above pet shops, but what searches *are* you expecting to list this site?
Plus, the fundamental core of Google’s search algorithm is that is up-lists sites that *searchers* declare are relevant by the *searchers* chosing to click through from the search results. If a search for “pet cats” lists foo, bar and toby, and more people click through to toby, then the next time somebody searches for “pet cats” the list will be toby, foo and bar.

650pianowire.{co.uk,org, com,media,museum}

FractiousCrew.co.uk

“monkeyswouldgovernbetterthanthat”

Yes.